Personalized Pricing and Product Positioning

Xi Li,Barrie R. Nault
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881900
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:We study competitive positioning and pricing decisions when firms can implement personalized pricing (PP). We find that, when firms make their positioning decisions before making their PP decisions, the cost of implementing PP not only affects product differentiation, firm profits, consumer surplus and social welfare, but also whether or not firms decide to actually implement PP. When the cost of implementing PP is low, firms cannot help but to implement PP and engage in direct price competition, thereby constituting a conventional form of the prisoner’s dilemma. Moreover, firms employing PP reduce their product differentiation, which intensifies the price competition even further. When the cost of implementing PP is moderate, firms do not implement PP; however, they must reduce their product differentiation to commit to not implementing PP, which, again aggravates the price competition. Finally, when the cost of implementing PP is high, the firms increase their product differentiation and do not implement PP. As a result, firm profits can be higher compared to the case without PP. We also find that, when firms make their positioning decisions after making their PP decisions, they never implement PP, thereby escaping the prisoner’s dilemma. These results underscore the complex effects of positioning decisions and timing on whether or not firms implement PP and their resulting pricing strategies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?