Abstract:Personalization technologies today enable retailers to tailor online purchase interactions to the individual preferences and needs of customers. With personalization being increasingly perceived as a source of competitive advantage, there is a growing trend toward pursuing technology-enabled personalization strategies in online retailing. However, the choice of a retailer whether or not to select into technology-enabled personalization and its implications for customer loyalty are at best ambiguous. This paper is an attempt to resolve this apparent ambiguity. Specifically, the paper conceptualizes retailer selection into technology-enabled personalization strategies relevant to two steps of an online purchase, namely, transaction personalization strategy and decision personalization strategy, based on the operating characteristics of a retailer. The implications of the retailers' self-selection into technology-enabled personalization strategies for customer loyalty are then empirically investigated with data collected from 422 retailers. Further, based on a counterfactual analysis, the paper reveals the implications of making a normatively incorrect decision with respect to personalization strategy. Contrary to popular belief, the results of this study indicate that personalization may not be uniformly beneficial in terms of customer loyalty to all retailers. Although a majority of retailers pursue transaction personalization and realize benefits by way of improved customer loyalty, we find that the choice of a retailer to pursue decision personalization is self-selected and dependent on idiosyncratic characteristics related to its operating context. Retailers that have relatively large-scale operations, provide greater variety and realize higher customer satisfaction with product selection, and that do not necessarily compete on price (i.e., realize lower customer satisfaction with prices relative to competing retailers) are more likely to pursue the decision personalization strategy. Although some retailers pursue decision personalization because they clearly stand to benefit from doing so, other retailers are better off not following suit. Theoretical contributions of the study, managerial implications of the study findings, limitations, and directions for future research are identified.

Purchase history and product personalization

Product personalization and brand retailer performance: The critical role of brand retailer‐upstream supplier control

Personalized Dynamic Pricing: Hidden Consequences for Customer Churn

Personalized Pricing and Consumer Welfare

Coarse Personalization

Price discrimination with consumer misperception

To Personalize or Not to Personalize Online Purchase Interactions: Implications of Self-Selection by Retailers

Personalized Pricing When Consumers Can Purchase Multiple Items

Pricing music using personal data: mutually advantageous first-degree price discrimination

Personalized Pricing and Information Sharing in a Distribution Channel

Is Personalized Pricing Profitable When Firms Can Differentiate?

Interpretable Personalization via Policy Learning with Linear Decision Boundaries

APPROXIMATING PURCHASE PROPENSITIES AND RESERVATION PRICES FROM BROAD CONSUMER TRACKING

Price Discrimination Based on Buyers’ Purchase History

(Reverse) Price Discrimination with Information Design

An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Purchase Decisions Under Bucket-Based Price Discrimination

A special price just for you: effects of personalized dynamic pricing on consumer fairness perceptions

Competitive Imperfect Price Discrimination and Market Power

Intertemporal Price Discrimination with Complementary Products: E-Books and E-Readers

Consumer Behavior under Benevolent Price Discrimination

Fairness, Welfare, and Equity in Personalized Pricing