Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11_suppl4, November 2024. ObjectivesTo compare anatomic versus non-anatomic-posterolateral-corner (PLC) reconstructions with autografts for grade 3 posterolateral corner knee lesions combined with single bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.MethodsAn outcome comparative study of chronic PCL lesions submitted to single bundle PCL reconstruction combined with a grade 3 PLC injury from Hughston and Fanelli classifications treated either by anatomic or non-anatomic PLC-reconstruction with autografts with at least 24 months of follow-up. Outcomes: Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner, side-to-side-difference (SSD) from posterior and varus stress radiographs, IKDC objective scores for posterior drawer, varus stress, dial test and recurvatum. Student's t- and two-proportion Z-test were used. Power for sample size was 88.2%.ResultsThirty-nine patients were evaluated: 18 in the Anatomic-PLC-group and 21 in the Non-anatomic-PLC-group. Mean follow-up: 28.3 months (range 24 to 59 months). Preoperatively, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age; time from injury until surgery; Lysholm; subjective IKDC; posterior, varus, external rotation or recurvatum laxity; stress radiographs; incidence of associated ligament and meniscus injuries. Postoperatively, no significant differences were observed for Lysholm (p=0.189), subjective IKDC (p=0.261), Tegner (p=0.385), mean improvement in Lysholm and IKDC scores (p=0.144, p=0.354, respectively), posterior tibial translation on stress radiographs [postoperative SSD (p=0.205) and percentage of patients with unacceptable (≥8mm) asymmetry (p=0.912)]; and complications. Significant differences favoring Anatomic-PLC-group were observed for Posterior-Drawer-Test (0.83±0.51 vs 1.1±0.43,p=0.046); Varus-Stress-Gapping at 30o (0.5±0.78 vs 1.14±0.85, p=0.01); Tibial-External-Rotation both 30o (33.3% vs 80.9%, p=0.002) and 90o (16.6% vs 47.6%, p=0.041); Asymmetrical-Recurvatum (5.5% vs 47.6%, p=0.00362); SSD-Lateral-Gapping-Varus-Stress-Radiographs (1.8±2.1 vs 3.35±2.28, p=0.028). Failure (presence of any of the following: Posterior Drawer ≥ 2+, Varus Stress ≥ 2+, SSD ≥ 8mm on Posterior-Radiograph or ≥ 4mm on Varus-Stress-Radiograph): 5% Anatomic versus 19% Non-anatomic, no statistical difference, p=0.103.ConclusionAnatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction with autografts provided superior stability compared to non-anatomic reconstruction in the setting of combined grade 3 posterolateral corner injuries and single bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Posterolateral Corner Injuries of the Knee: Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Demystifying the "Dark Side of the Knee": An Update on Imaging of the Posterolateral Corner

Surgical Approaches to the Posteromedial and Posterolateral Aspects of the Knee

Treatment of combined anterior cruciate ligament-posterior cruciate ligament-lateral side injuries of the knee

Reconstruction of the Posterolateral Corner After Sequential Sectioning Restores Knee Kinematics

Editorial Commentary: Knee Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Shows Low Failure and Complication Rates

Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes Following Popliteal Tendon Tenodesis and Popliteal Tendon Reconstruction

Anatomic, All-arthroscopic Reconstruction of Posterolateral Corner of the Knee: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Posterolateral approach for all-inside arthroscopic lateral meniscus repair in athletes: technique and outcomes

Anatomic reconstruction of the posteromedial corner of the knee: The Versailles technique

Anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction with autografts provides superior stability compared to non-anatomic reconstruction in the setting of combined grade 3 posterolateral corner injury and single bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: Modification of the LaPrade Technique Using Autologous Hamstring Tendon Grafts – "The Popliteofibular Loop"

Arthroscopic-assisted Treatment of a Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fracture with an Accompanying Tibial Eminence Fracture. Case Report

Perturbation Training in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Tear and Posterolateral Corner Injury: A Case Report of a Combined Injury

Single-stage arthroscopic-assisted treatment of anteromedial tibial plateau fracture with posterolateral corner injury: a retrospective study

Two Cases of Contact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Combined with a Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fracture

Posteromedial Submeniscal Arthrotomy and Fixation with a Posteromedial Rim Plate in a Comminuted Medial Tibial Plateau Fracture

Meniscal Root Tears: A Decade of Research on their Relevant Anatomy, Biomechanics, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Three-column subdivision for isolated posterolateral tibial plateau fractures and perspective surgical approaches

A combined prone and supine approaches for complex three column tibial plateau fracture with posterolateral articular injury

A Novel Surgical Treatment Management Algorithm for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability (PLRI) Based on the Common Extensor Origin Integrity