Abstract:Big Data &Society, Volume 9, Issue 2, July-December 2022. With the surge in the number of data and datafied governance initiatives, arrangements, and practices across the globe, understanding various types of such initiatives, arrangements, and their structural causes has become a daunting task for scholars, policy makers, and the public. This complexity additionally generates substantial difficulties in considering different data(fied) governances commensurable with each other. To advance the discussion, this study argues that existing scholarship is inclined to embrace an organization-centric perspective that primarily concerns factors and dynamics regarding data and datafication at the organizational level at the expense of macro-level social, political, and cultural factors of both data and governance. To explicate the macro, societal dimension of data governance, this study then suggests the term "social data governance" to bring forth the consideration that data governance not only reflects the society from which it emerges but also (re)produces the policies and practices of the society in question. Drawing on theories of political science and public management, a model of social data governance is proposed to elucidate the ideological and conceptual groundings of various modes of governance from a comparative perspective. This preliminary model, consisting of a two-dimensional continuum, state intervention and societal autonomy for the one, and national cultures for the other, accounts for variations in social data governance across societies as a complementary way of conceptualizing and categorizing data governance beyond the European standpoint. Finally, we conduct an extreme case study of governing digital contact-tracing techniques during the pandemic to exemplify the explanatory power of the proposed model of social data governance.

Constraining context: Situating datafication in public administration

Situating Data Sets: Making Public Data Actionable for Housing Justice

Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning

Algorithmic governmentality and the space of ethics: Examples from ‘People Analytics’

Datafication and the practice of intelligence production

Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance: A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public Administration

Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality?

Rubbing against data infrastructure(s): methodological explorations on working with(in) the impossibility of exteriority

A comparative analysis of data governance: Socio-technical imaginaries of digital personal data in the USA and EU (2008–2016)

Overlit: Digital Architectures of Visibility

The Public Sector In An In-Between Time: Searching For New Public Values

Public Administration, Context and Innovation: A Framework of Analysis

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

Social data governance: Towards a definition and model

Thinking About Data With Grounded Theory

On phantom publics, clusters, and collectives: be(com)ing subject in algorithmic times

The interactive field of open government data: inter-administrative dynamics, trans-local networks, and local geopolitics of environmental data activism in China

Super-reflective Data: Speculative Imaginings of a World Where Data Works for People

The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue

Sensing from the middle: middle managers’ sensemaking of change process in public organizations

The limits of the imaginary: Challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms