Abstract:NATURE, inert to the eyes of the ancients, has been revealed to us as full of life and activity. The conviction that motion pervaded all things, which was first realized with respect to the stellar universe, has now extended to the unseen world of atoms. No sooner had the human understanding denied to the earth a fixed position and launched it along its path in space, than it was sought to fix immovably the sun and the stars. But astronomy has demonstrated that the sun moves with unswerving regularity through the star-set universe at the rate of about 50 kilometres per second. Among the so called fixed stars are now discerned manifold changes and various orders of movement. Light, heat, electricity—like sound—have been proved to be modes of motion; to the realization of this fact modern science is indebted for powers which have been used with such brilliant success, and which have been expounded so clearly at this lecture-table by Faraday and by his successors. As in the imagination of Dante the invisible air became peopled with spiritual beings, so before the eyes of earnest investigators, and especially before those of Clerk Maxwell, the invisible mass of gases became peopled with particles: their rapid movements, their collisions and impacts became so manifest that it seemed almost possible to count the impacts and determine many of the peculiarities or laws of their collisions. The fact of the existence of these invisible motions may at once be made apparent by demonstrating the difference in the rate of diffusion through porous bodies of the light and rapidly moving atoms of hydrogen and the heavier and more sluggish particles of air. Within the masses of liquid and of solid bodies we have been forced to acknowledge the existence of persistent though limited motion of their ultimate particles, for otherwise it would be impossible to explain, for example, the celebrated experiments of Graham on diffusion through liquid and colloidal substances. If there were, in our times, no belief in the molecular motion in solid bodies, could the famous Spring have hoped to attain any result by mixing carefully dried powders of potash saltpetre, and acetate of soda, in order to produce, by pressure, a chemical reaction between these substances through the interchange of their metals, and have derived, for the conviction of the incredulous, a mixture of two hygroscopic though solid salts—nitrate of soda and acetate of potash?

An essay of Dr. John Wallis, exhibiting his hypothesis about the flux and reflux of the sea, taken from the consideration of the common center of gravity of the Earth and Moon

III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids

The universality of the law of the wall: A long-lasting controversial debate

A translation of L. Euler's " Examination of an artifice for propelling a ship by the principle of internal motion"

A harbinger of plate tectonics: a commentary on Bullard, Everett and Smith (1965) 'The fit of the continents around the Atlantic'

An early Scottish pamphlet on hydraulics and pneumatics: William Welwood's De aqua in altum per fistulas plumbeas facile exprimenda apologia demonstrativa (1582)

Anomalies of the tides

When Everything hinges On Gravitation

Gravity and motion

Galileo and Buonamici on the Tides of the Sea: Was Something Omitted from the Dialogue?

Translation of Leonhard Euler's: General Principles of the Motion of Fluids

Meteorology and Oceanography on a Flat Earth

I. On the influence of geological changes on the Earth's axis of rotation

Attempt at a theory of the friction of fluids

Hermann Hankel's "On the general theory of motion of fluids", an essay including an English translation of the complete Preisschrift from 1861

An Attempt to Apply to Chemistry One of the Principles of Newton's Natural Philosophy

The place of Archimedes in world history

Relativistic Arquimedes law for fast moving bodies and the general-relativistic resolution of the "submarine paradox"

Gravity is indeed the driving force for fault pattern formation and westward displacement of the lithosphere

To see a world in a grain of sand

The variety of readings of Archimedes in the scientific revolution: Leibniz vs. Newton