Abstract:The United States “Indo-Pacific strategy” itself entails geopolitics. Since 2017, the Indo-Pacific has emerged as a major strategic region for America’s diplomacy and security. Against this backdrop, the Indo-Pacific strategy extends both the “Asia Rebalancing Strategy” and the “Asia-Pacific Security Alliance” regime to the Indian Ocean, while seeking to bring emerging countries, such as China and India, into the U.S.-led international order. Major East Asian countries are actively employing economic means to advance their geopolitical goal -- reshaping the regional order in their own favor. The U.S. has shown a confrontational and exclusionary attitude toward China in terms of politics, economy and security, while the ASEAN has sought to promote inclusiveness by publicly expressing opposition to the exclusion of China. The ASEAN highlighted economic cooperation with China, while the U.S. focused on military and security aspects. The Indo-Pacific strategy will not be able to succeed without the participation of the ASEAN that serves as a crucial geopolitical link between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Another important factor is that unlike former U.S. President Obama, who championed the Asia-Pacific rebalance, President Donald Trump does not show keen interest in the Indo-Pacific strategy. At the same time, President Moon Jae-in has been cautious about engaging in security issues that go beyond the Korean Peninsula or the Northeast Asia -- namely joining in any collective move to contain China. Currently, South Korea is grappling with the geopolitical challenges by expressing support for the ASEAN's geoeconomic approach. Instead of choosing whether to participate in the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy, South Korea is seeking common ground between the strategy and its “New Southern Policy.” In other words, the New Southern Policy is a kind of buffer zone. South Korea is taking a geoeconomic response that focuses on developing the regional economy rather than adhering to the strategic and military role of the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy.

South Korea’s Strategic Options amid the US–China Strategic Competition Under the Biden Administration

From engagement to hedging: South Korea's new China policy

Hedging between the United States and China? South Korea’s ideology-driven behavior and its implications for national security

South Korea’s Diplomacy in an Era of US-China Strategic Competition

Bolstering the Alliance for a Trilateralism‐Based Security Strategy for South Korea in Times of US–China Rivalry*

A study of the United States of America and China’s new cold war conflicts and the flexible survival strategy for Korean security

South Korea's Foreign Policy Shifts Under President Yoon and Implications for the Sino-US Peer Competition

South Korea’s Geoeconomic Response to the United States’ Geopolitical Approach

South Korea’s Evolving Balanced Diplomacy and China: A Discourse and Big Data Analysis of President Moon Jae-in’s Perception

On Factors of the United States in China-ROK Strategic Cooperative Partnership

Technological Confrontation between the USA and China as a Challenge to the Foreign Economic Strategy of the Republic of Korea

A study on Korea's economic development strategy through ASEAN in the US-China hegemony competition

Riding the tide: assessing South Korea’s hedging strategy through regional security initiatives

From blood alliance to strategic alliance: Korea's evolving strategic thought toward the United States

South Korea Releases Indo-Pacific Strategy: Analysis of Shifting Attitudes and Motivations

Taking a side between the United States and the People’s Republic of China: Strategic hedging of South Korea and India

Germany's relations with the United States and China from a strategic triangle perspective

Bolstering middle power standing: South Korea's response to U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy from Trump to Biden

South Korea and the U.S. Strategy of Free and Open Indo-Pacific

Between Autonomy and Alliance: the Evolution of South Korea’s Alliance Management Strategy

Changes and Continuities in South Korea’s Major Foreign and Security Policies under the Yoon Suk-yeol Administration