Abstract:This paper aims to examine the US–South Korea alliance from the perspective of the "Autonomy–Security Trade‐off" (AST) model, which was introduced by Michael F. Altfeld in the 1980s. This model could be a useful tool to ascertain the minimum conditions for the implementation of the US nuclear umbrella, which is a life‐and‐death issue for South Korea (ROK) given the serious North Korean nuclear threat. For this purpose, this paper introduces the key concept of the model and applies it to the ROK‐US alliance, analyzing the controversy over the deployment of the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system (THAAD) to South Korea as a case study. The analysis found that South Korea started its alliance with the United States based on the AST model. However, South Korea became reluctant in yielding its autonomy to the United States in the 1990s, and initiated "balanced diplomacy" between the United States and China and the reclaiming of the Operational Control Authority (OPCON) from the commander of the ROK‐US Combined Forces Command (CFC), a US General, in the 2000s. It delayed the deployment of the US THAAD for 3 years only because China opposed the deployment even after North Korea had succeeded to develop its nuclear weapons. However, South Korea had to return to the original AST model, albeit reluctantly, because of the emergence of a more serious North Korean nuclear threat, including hydrogen bombs. It did not try, with any great effort, to improve its relationship with China, and reduced the scope of OPCON by appointing a South Korean General as the Command of the CFC, allowing the deployment of the THAAD. Now that North Korea has the potential capabilities to strike the US mainland, South Korea cannot afford to be reluctant in yielding its autonomy to the United States. In this context, South Korea should not pursue its balanced diplomacy between the United States and China any longer. To the contrary, it should participate in the United States' Indo‐Pacific strategy. It may also need to stop its pursuit of appointing its general as the Commander of the CFC until North Korea gives up its nuclear weapons. It should also become more willing to increase its cost‐sharing with the United States. In conclusion, South Korea should try to accept the recommendations from the AST model as long as its needs the US nuclear umbrella and wants to protect its people from the North Korean nuclear threat.

Between Autonomy and Alliance: the Evolution of South Korea’s Alliance Management Strategy

From blood alliance to strategic alliance: Korea's evolving strategic thought toward the United States

Bolstering the Alliance for a Trilateralism‐Based Security Strategy for South Korea in Times of US–China Rivalry*

On Factors of the United States in China-ROK Strategic Cooperative Partnership

The South Korea–US Alliance under the North Korean Nuclear Threat: A Reluctant Return to the “Autonomy–Security Trade‐Off”

South Korea’s Strategic Options amid the US–China Strategic Competition Under the Biden Administration

TIME-VARYING CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUTH KOREA-UNITED STATES AND JAPAN-UNITED STATES MILITARY ALLIANCES UNDER CHINESE THREAT: A PUBLIC GOOD APPROACH

Redefining Middle Power Diplomacy: South Korea’s Strategic Shift towards Global Leadership

From a buffer zone to a strategic burden: evolving Sino-North Korea relations during the Hu Jintao era

South Korea and the U.S. Strategy of Free and Open Indo-Pacific

Unravelling the US-ROK Alliance: Decoding North Korea’s Strategy within the Six-Party Talks

Riding the tide: assessing South Korea’s hedging strategy through regional security initiatives

Economic Integration and Political Cooperation Between South Korea and China: Implications for Korea-US Relations

Bridging the ‘Open Water’ in the US-South Korea Military Alliance

South Korea's Foreign Policy Shifts Under President Yoon and Implications for the Sino-US Peer Competition

The US–South Korea alliance: How the patron benefits from the protégé

A study of the United States of America and China’s new cold war conflicts and the flexible survival strategy for Korean security

Enemy, Homager or Equal Partner?: Evolving Korea-China Relations

The Indo-Pacific Strategy of the Republic of Korea

Co-evolution of exploration-exploitation strategy and weak-strong ties portfolios: A longitudinal case study: Co-evolution of exploration-exploitation strategy and weak-strong ties portfolios: A longitudinal case study

The Republic of Korea Between China and the United States in the Face of Confrontation Over Taiwan