Abstract:Two major types of aggression, proactive and reactive, are associated with contrasting expression, eliciting factors, neural pathways, development, and function. The distinction is useful for understanding the nature and evolution of human aggression. Compared with many primates, humans have a high propensity for proactive aggression, a trait shared with chimpanzees but not bonobos. By contrast, humans have a low propensity for reactive aggression compared with chimpanzees, and in this respect humans are more bonobo-like. The bimodal classification of human aggression helps solve two important puzzles. First, a long-standing debate about the significance of aggression in human nature is misconceived, because both positions are partly correct. The Hobbes–Huxley position rightly recognizes the high potential for proactive violence, while the Rousseau–Kropotkin position correctly notes the low frequency of reactive aggression. Second, the occurrence of two major types of human aggression solves the execution paradox, concerned with the hypothesized effects of capital punishment on self-domestication in the Pleistocene. The puzzle is that the propensity for aggressive behavior was supposedly reduced as a result of being selected against by capital punishment, but capital punishment is itself an aggressive behavior. Since the aggression used by executioners is proactive, the execution paradox is solved to the extent that the aggressive behavior of which victims were accused was frequently reactive, as has been reported. Both types of killing are important in humans, although proactive killing appears to be typically more frequent in war. The biology of proactive aggression is less well known and merits increased attention.

Cognition and Aggression: A Reply to Fowers and Richardson

Human Aggression

Thinking through the social world: Further exploring the direct, moderated, and mediated relationship between need for cognition and aggression

Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis

The expression and reduction of hostility.

Understanding injustice-related aggression in organizations: a cognitive model

Human aggression in everyday life: An empirical test of the general aggression model

Hot sauce, toy guns, and graffiti: A critical account of current laboratory aggression paradigms

The I3 Model: a metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression

Cognitive and social-cognitive factors as mediators of aggression using structural equation modeling

Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy.

Reputation systems, aggression, and deterrence in social interaction

Author's response: The challenge of peace

Experimental evidence suggests intergroup relations are, by default, neutral rather than aggressive

From hitting to tattling to gossip: an evolutionary rationale for the development of indirect aggression

The Evolutionary Psychology of War: Offense and Defense in the Adapted Mind

Two types of aggression in human evolution

Anthropological Foundations of Aggression and Personal Safety on the Example of Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan

The centrality of cognition and coping styles in driving aggressive responses

A Review and Reconceptualization of Social Aggression: Adaptive and Maladaptive Correlates

Cognitive resource theory: Issues for specifying a test of the theory.