Abstract:Indirect reciprocity in which players cooperate with unacquainted other players having good reputations is a mechanism for cooperation in relatively large populations subjected to social dilemma situations. When the population has group structure, as is often found in social networks, players in experiments are considered to show behavior that deviates from existing theoretical models of indirect reciprocity. First, players often show ingroup favoritism (i.e., cooperation only within the group) rather than full cooperation (i.e., cooperation within and across groups), even though the latter is Pareto efficient. Second, in general, humans approximate outgroup members' personal characteristics, presumably including the reputation used for indirect reciprocity, by a single value attached to the group. Humans use such a stereotypic approximation, a phenomenon known as outgroup homogeneity in social psychology. I propose a model of indirect reciprocity in populations with group structure to examine the possibility of ingroup favoritism and full cooperation. In accordance with outgroup homogeneity, I assume that players approximate outgroup members' personal reputations by a single reputation value attached to the group. I show that ingroup favoritism and full cooperation are stable under different social norms (i.e., rules for assigning reputations) such that they do not coexist in a single model. If players are forced to consistently use the same social norm for assessing different types of interactions (i.e., ingroup versus outgroup interactions), only full cooperation survives. The discovered mechanism is distinct from any form of group selection. The results also suggest potential methods for reducing ingroup bias to shift the equilibrium from ingroup favoritism to full cooperation.

Experimental evidence suggests intergroup relations are, by default, neutral rather than aggressive

Evidence of the active participation of women in the intergroup conflict based on the use of aggression and cooperation

“In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict

Spoils division rules shape aggression between natural groups

Parochial cooperation in nested intergroup dilemmas is reduced when it harms out-groups.

The nasty neighbor effect in humans

Outgroup Homogeneity Bias Causes Ingroup Favoritism

Environmental stress increases out-group aggression and intergroup conflict in humans

The influence of aggressive behavior on cooperation evolution in social dilemma

Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation

The conflict-cooperation effect persists under intragroup payoff asymmetry

Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games

Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy.

No evidence for inequity aversion in non-human animals: a meta-analysis of accept/reject paradigms

Be the Change You Want to See: Intergroup Helping Reduces InGroup Bias and Facilitates OutGroup Bias in Trading Behaviors

Do Violent Video Games Reduce Aggression? The Roles of Prosociality and Cooperation

Using artificial agents to nudge outgroup altruism and reduce ingroup favoritism in human-agent interaction

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

The restart effect in social dilemmas shows humans are self-interested not altruistic

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

Zero-determinant alliances in multiplayer social dilemmas