Future mainstream platform for online adaptive radiotherapy will be using on‐board MR rather than on‐board (CB) CT images

Daniel E. Hyer,Bin Cai,Yi Rong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13352
2021-07-01
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Abstract:As several major non-inferiority phase 3 clinical trial studies published their promising results,<span><sup><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#acm213352-bib-0001">1</a>, <a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#acm213352-bib-0002">2</a></sup></span> and as the reimbursement pattern is reforming from fee-for-service payment to episode-based payment,<span><sup><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#acm213352-bib-0003">3</a></sup></span> the radiation oncology field is undergoing a major paradigm shift, from a majority of standard fractionation treatments to more hypo-fractionation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). With this change, the need to verify daily radiotherapy dose and adapt the radiotherapy plan according to daily anatomy has become essential.<span><sup><a class="bibLink tab-link" href="#acm213352-bib-0004">4</a></sup></span> Currently, the most common platforms for online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) include MRI-guided ART (MRgART) and CT (or cone-beam CT)-guided ART (CTgART), both of which have only been adopted by a handful of large-scale hospital-based cancer centers around the world. As more experience is collected and technology matures, one would hope that advanced online ART platforms should become more affordable and accessible to a larger community. That brings this month's debate topic: "<i>Future mainstream platform for online adaptive radiotherapy will be using on</i>-<i>board MR rather than on</i>-<i>board (CB) CT images</i>." Herein, we invited Dr. Daniel Hyer and Dr. Bin Cai to join us for this debate.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?