Abstract:For a century, developmental psychology, and psychology as a whole, has been caught in an objectivity-validity dilemma which divides the scientific community: when measuring psychological traits, researchers either strive for objectivity at the expense of validity in regard to the object of the measurement, or they strive for validity by using subjective information from participants and subjective methods of rating this information, thus lacking objectivity. While the main problem of physical measurement is precision, the main problem of psychology is validity: does an instrument really measure what it should? On the one hand, psychologists like Sigmund Freud, Jean Piaget and Lawrence Kohlberg believed that valid inferences on psychological functioning can only be made through subjective methods like clinical interviews – at the expense of objectivity. On the other hand, scientists working in the tradition of Louis Leon Thurston and Karl Pearson wanted to turn psychology into an objective science by assessing psychological traits through behavioral data even if that meant deleting important psychological traits like moral orientations and moral competence from the scientific research agenda. In this article I will show that this methodological dilemma can be (and has been) resolved on the basis of the ideas of Franciscus Cornelis Donders (1868), who, a long time ago, showed how we can study internal mental processes in an objective way, that is, without relying on the subjective experience of the participant and without subjective scoring. Interestingly, Donders used behavioral dilemmas in order to measure thinking. It took us a long time to understand the significance of Donders’ invention and to apply it to psychological measurement. Our Moral Competence Test (MCT) is probably the first method of psychological measurement based on it. The MCT has helped us to test many hypotheses on moral orientations and moral competence objectively, which hitherto could be studied only with subjective methods. It has also made possible to design and evaluate new, effective methods of moral education.

A Developmental Test of Mertonian Anomie Theory

Street Youths and the Proximate and Contingent Causes of Instrumental Crime: Untangling Anomie Theory

Theorizing Anomie

A new test of classic strain theory

Predicting Moffitt's Developmental Taxonomy of Antisocial Behavior Using Life History Theory: A Partial Test of the Evolutionary Taxonomy

Moral Development in Adolescence: A Test of Change and Influences in Context of Sat with German Panel Data

Testing a Typology of Adaptations to Same-Sex Sexual Orientation among Men

Marketized mentality and instrumental offending: the overlooked roles of noneconomic institutions and relative deprivation in individual level institutional anomie theory

When the West Meets the East: Cultural Clash and Its Impacts on Anomie in a Sample of Chinese Adolescents

From Donders’ Dilemma to Objective Internal Assessment: How Experimental Developmental Psychology Can Contribute to Moral Education

Durkheim’s theory of anomie and crime: A clarification and elaboration

Testing Ecological Theories of Offender Spatial Decision Making Using a Discrete Choice Model

Adolescent Ecstasy Use: A Test of Social Bonds and Social Learning Theory

The juvenile delinquent as a moral philosopher: A structural-developmental perpective.

Testing For Measurement Invariance of Attachment Across Chinese and American Adolescent Samples

A Longitudinal Test of Social Learning Theory: Adolescent Smoking

Alcohol Use and Moffitt's Maturity Gap Thesis for Adolescent Offending: An Evolutionary Perspective and Analysis

Measurement Invariance and Comparison of Mean Scores by Age Cohort of Two Versions of the Male Role Norms Inventory

A Sociological Framework to Reduce Aberrant Behaviour of School Students Through Increasing School Connectedness

Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime

A Test of Self‐Control Theory Across Different Socioeconomic Strata