Abstract:Identifying landscapes that are suitable for both biodiversity conservation and agricultural production is a major challenge. Traditionally, much research has focused on biodiversity conservation outside of agricultural production areas, e.g., in semi-natural habitats. In contrast, recent research has mainly focused on the potential of crop heterogeneity. This includes both compositional (crop diversity) and configurational heterogeneity (field border density). However, if and how crop heterogeneity, and semi-natural habitats interact to shape insect diversity in agricultural landscapes remains poorly understood. Here we investigated the combined effects of crop diversity, field border density, and semi-natural habitats (i.e., grassland proportion, hedge density) on insect diversity. We sampled insect communities from 14 – 17 June 2021 with pan traps in 27 study landscapes (500 m x 500 m) covering independent gradients of these landscape variables and identified a total of 587 insect species with DNA metabarcoding. We found that field border density mediated the effects of crop diversity, grassland proportion, and hedge density on insect richness. At low levels of field border density (i.e., landscapes with mostly large fields), effects were either neutral (crop diversity), negative (grassland proportion) or weakly positive (hedge density). By contrast, at high levels of field border density, crop diversity, grassland proportion, and hedge density all exerted positive effects on insect richness. Responses to crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitat differed among trophic groups of insects (decomposers, herbivores, parasitoids, predators). While variation in richness of herbivorous insects followed the patterns of the overall richness, decomposer richness was not related to any of the investigated variables. Predator richness increased with hedge density in landscapes, whereas parasitoid richness increased when high levels of field border density and grassland proportion coincided. Our study shows that increasing crop heterogeneity is a viable strategy for promoting insect diversity in agricultural landscapes. However, the effects of the amount of remaining semi-natural habitats, such as grassland or hedges, are mediated by configurational heterogeneity, and vary between trophic groups. Efforts to conserve insects in agricultural landscapes must therefore focus on both increasing the heterogeneity of the crop matrix by promoting crop diversity and increasing the density of field borders, while also maintaining or restoring semi-natural habitats as important source habitats for insect species.

Does habitat loss affect the communities of plants and insects equally in plant–pollinator interactions? Preliminary findings

Experimental loss of generalist plants reveals alterations in plant-pollinator interactions and a constrained flexibility of foraging

Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along local and landscape gradients of resource diversity

Global effects of land-use intensity on local pollinator biodiversity

Flowering plant communities mediate the effects of habitat composition and configuration on wild pollinator communities

Pollinator-mediated effects of landscape-scale land use on grassland plant community composition and ecosystem functioning - seven hypotheses

The effects of experimental floral resource removal on plant-pollinator interactions

The role of asymmetric interactions on the effect of habitat destruction in mutualistic networks

Stable species and interactions in plant-pollinator networks deviate from core position in fragmented habitats

Pollen-insect interaction meta-networks identify key relationships for conservation in mosaic agricultural landscapes

Urbanisation and agricultural intensification modulate plant–pollinator network structure and robustness

Temporal Shifts in Flower-Visiting Butterfly Communities and Their Floral Resources along a Vegetation Type Altered by Anthropogenic Factors

Direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators: evidence, impacts and approaches

The degree of urbanisation reduces wild bee and butterfly diversity and alters the patterns of flower-visitation in urban dry grasslands

Land-use change alters specialist bee diet and drives body size declines

Density‐dependent dispersal strategy of pollinator moderates the adverse effect of habitat loss on plant reproduction: An integrated model based on pollinators' behavioral response

Habitat loss and simplification lower arthropod richness but not diversity

One‐size does not fit all: at‐risk bumble bee habitat management requires species‐specific local and landscape considerations

Long-lasting negative effects of past forestation on grassland pollination networks and their function

Pollinators respond positively to urban green space enhancements using wild and ornamental flowers

Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes needs both high crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitats