Abstract:The rapid growth of the digital economy has significantly enhanced the convenience of information transmission while reducing its costs. As a result, the participation in social networks (SNs) has surged, intensifying the mutual influence among network participants. To support objective decision-making and gather public opinions within SNs, the research on the consensus-reaching process (CRP) has become increasingly important. However, CRP faces three key challenges: first, as the number of decision-makers (DMs) increases, the efficiency of reaching consensus declines; second, minority opinions and non-cooperative behaviors affect decision outcomes; and third, the relationships among DMs complicate opinion adjustments. To address these challenges, this paper introduces an enhanced CRP mechanism. Initially, the hippopotamus optimization algorithm (HOA) is applied to update the initial community division in Leiden clustering, which accelerates the clustering process, collectively referred to as HOAL. Subsequently, a two-stage opinion adjustment method is proposed, combining minority opinion handling (MOH), non-cooperative behavior management, and dual-fine tuning (DFT) management, collectively referred to as DFT-MOH. Moreover, trust relationships between DMs are directly integrated into both the clustering and opinion management processes, resulting in the HOAL-DFT-MOH framework. The proposed method proceeds by three main steps: (1) First, the HOAL clusters DMs. (2) Then, in the initial CRP stage, DFT manages subgroup opinions with a weighted average to synthesize subgroup perspectives; and in the second stage, MOH addresses minority opinions, a non-cooperative mechanism manages uncooperative behaviors, and DFT is used when negative behaviors are absent. (3) Third, the prospect-regret theory is applied to rank decision alternatives. Finally, the approach is applied to case analyses across three different scenarios, while comparative experiments with other clustering and CRP methods highlight its superior performance.

A Toolkit for Democratizing Science and Technology Policy: The Practical Mechanics of Organizing a Consensus Conference

Consensus Conferences As Participatory Policy Analysis, A Methodological Contribution To The Social Management Of Technology

Consensus-building in Policy Argumentation: Practical Logic and Methodological Tools

Democratic Policy Development using Collective Dialogues and AI

The consensus protocol: How a radical process, invented to build the ARPANET, spawned history's greatest tool for collaborative work

Ethics Inside the Black Box: Integrating Science and Technology Studies into Engineering and Public Policy Curricula

A twenty-first century Citizens’ POLIS: introducing a democratic experiment in electronic citizen participation in science and technology decision-making

Who is Public, How to Engage, and What is Consensus?——Reflections on Public Engagement with Science

A map of technopolitics: Deep convergence, platform ontologies, and cognitive efficiency

Democratizing CRISPR? Stories, practices, and politics of science and governance on the agricultural gene editing frontier

Collaborative Structuring of Knowledge by Experts and the Public

Facilitating Constructive Discussions of Difficult Socio-Scientific Issues

The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Ethics and Technology in Action

Composite Consensus-Building Process: Permissible Meeting Analysis and Compromise Choice Exploration

Democratizing Machine Learning for Interdisciplinary Scholars: Report on Organizing the NLP+CSS Online Tutorial Series

Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence

Engineering Collaborative Social Science Toolkits. STS Methods and Concepts as Devices for Interdisciplinary Diplomacy

Coercion, Consent, and Participation in Citizen Science

Democratising blockchain: A minimal agency consensus model

A Pluralist Approach to Democratizing Online Discourse

Enhancing Group Consensus in Social Networks: A Two-Stage Dual-Fine Tuning Consensus Model Based on Adaptive Leiden Algorithm and Minority Opinion Management with Non-Cooperative Behaviors