Abstract:BACKGROUND:Accurate annotation of translation initiation sites (TISs) is essential for understanding the translation initiation mechanism. However, the reliability of TIS annotation in widely used databases such as RefSeq is uncertain due to the lack of experimental benchmarks.RESULTS:Based on a homogeneity assumption that gene translation-related signals are uniformly distributed across a genome, we have established a computational method for a large-scale quantitative assessment of the reliability of TIS annotations for any prokaryotic genome. The method consists of modeling a positional weight matrix (PWM) of aligned sequences around predicted TISs in terms of a linear combination of three elementary PWMs, one for true TIS and the two others for false TISs. The three elementary PWMs are obtained using a reference set with highly reliable TIS predictions. A generalized least square estimator determines the weighting of the true TIS in the observed PWM, from which the accuracy of the prediction is derived. The validity of the method and the extent of the limitation of the assumptions are explicitly addressed by testing on experimentally verified TISs with variable accuracy of the reference sets. The method is applied to estimate the accuracy of TIS annotations that are provided on public databases such as RefSeq and ProTISA and by programs such as EasyGene, GeneMarkS, Glimmer 3 and TiCo. It is shown that RefSeq's TIS prediction is significantly less accurate than two recent predictors, Tico and ProTISA. With convincing proofs, we show two general preferential biases in the RefSeq annotation, i.e. over-annotating the longest open reading frame (LORF) and under-annotating ATG start codon. Finally, we have established a new TIS database, SupTISA, based on the best prediction of all the predictors; SupTISA has achieved an average accuracy of 92% over all 532 complete genomes.CONCLUSION:Large-scale computational evaluation of TIS annotation has been achieved. A new TIS database much better than RefSeq has been constructed, and it provides a valuable resource for further TIS studies.

Estimating the annotation error rate of curated GO database sequence annotations

Annotation Error in Public Databases: Misannotation of Molecular Function in Enzyme Superfamilies

Biases in the Experimental Annotations of Protein Function and Their Effect on Our Understanding of Protein Function Space

Genome annotation errors in pathway databases due to semantic ambiguity in partial EC numbers

An Integrative Method for Identifying the Over-Annotated Protein-Coding Genes in Microbial Genomes.

Automated Methods of Predicting the Function of Biological Sequences Using GO and Rough Set

Interpreting Gene Ontology Annotations Derived from Sequence Homology Methods

Comprehensive assessment of error correction methods for high-throughput sequencing data

NoisyGOA: Noisy GO Annotations Prediction Using Taxonomic and Semantic Similarity

Overcoming the widespread flaws in the annotation of vertebrate selenoprotein genes in public databases

A Manual Curation Strategy to Improve Genome Annotation: Application to a Set of Haloarchael Genomes

A Hybrid Strategy for Comprehensive Annotation of the Protein Coding Genes in Prokaryotic Genome

NoisyGOA: Noisy GO annotations prediction using taxonomic and semantic similarity.

Estimating Agreement by Chance for Sequence Annotation

A Method of Gene-Function Annotation Based on Variable Precision Rough Sets

Can inferred provenance and its visualisation be used to detect erroneous annotation? A case study using UniProtKB

Automated identification of protein classification and detection of annotation errors in protein databases using statistical approaches

Annotation of gene product function from high-throughput studies using the Gene Ontology

Bioinformatics Procedure of Large-scale GO Annotation

Computational Evaluation of TIS Annotation for Prokaryotic Genomes.

The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011