Abstract:Abstract Background Despite significant improvements in computational annotation of genomes, sequences of abnormal, incomplete or incorrectly predicted genes and proteins remain abundant in public databases. Since the majority of incomplete, abnormal or mispredicted entries are not annotated as such, these errors seriously affect the reliability of these databases. Here we describe the MisPred approach that may provide an efficient means for the quality control of databases. The current version of the MisPred approach uses five distinct routines for identifying abnormal, incomplete or mispredicted entries based on the principle that a sequence is likely to be incorrect if some of its features conflict with our current knowledge about protein-coding genes and proteins: (i) conflict between the predicted subcellular localization of proteins and the absence of the corresponding sequence signals; (ii) presence of extracellular and cytoplasmic domains and the absence of transmembrane segments; (iii) co-occurrence of extracellular and nuclear domains; (iv) violation of domain integrity; (v) chimeras encoded by two or more genes located on different chromosomes. Results Analyses of predicted EnsEMBL protein sequences of nine deuterostome ( Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Monodelphis domestica, Gallus gallus, Xenopus tropicalis, Fugu rubripes, Danio rerio and Ciona intestinalis ) and two protostome species ( Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster ) have revealed that the absence of expected signal peptides and violation of domain integrity account for the majority of mispredictions. Analyses of sequences predicted by NCBI's GNOMON annotation pipeline show that the rates of mispredictions are comparable to those of EnsEMBL. Interestingly, even the manually curated UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot dataset is contaminated with mispredicted or abnormal proteins, although to a much lesser extent than UniProtKB/TrEMBL or the EnsEMBL or GNOMON-predicted entries. Conclusion MisPred works efficiently in identifying errors in predictions generated by the most reliable gene prediction tools such as the EnsEMBL and NCBI's GNOMON pipelines and also guides the correction of errors. We suggest that application of the MisPred approach will significantly improve the quality of gene predictions and the associated databases.

Annotation Error in Public Databases: Misannotation of Molecular Function in Enzyme Superfamilies

Genome annotation errors in pathway databases due to semantic ambiguity in partial EC numbers

Identification and correction of abnormal, incomplete and mispredicted proteins in public databases

Estimating the annotation error rate of curated GO database sequence annotations

Biases in the Experimental Annotations of Protein Function and Their Effect on Our Understanding of Protein Function Space

MisPred: a resource for identification of erroneous protein sequences in public databases

Gene annotation errors are common in the mammalian mitochondrial genomes database

Automated identification of protein classification and detection of annotation errors in protein databases using statistical approaches

A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function

High precision multi-genome scale reannotation of enzyme function by EFICAz

Overcoming the widespread flaws in the annotation of vertebrate selenoprotein genes in public databases

CRISPR sequences are sometimes erroneously translated and can contaminate public databases with spurious proteins containing spaced repeats

Semi-Automatic Detection of Errors in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models

A Longitudinal Analysis of Function Annotations of the Human Proteome Reveals Consistently High Biases

Improving enzyme functional annotation by integrating in vitro and in silico approaches: The example of histidinol phosphate phosphatases

Automated validation of genetic variants from large databases: ensuring that variant references refer to the same genomic locations

Machine learning for discovering missing or wrong protein function annotations

Piecing together the structure-function puzzle: experiences in structure-based functional annotation of hypothetical proteins.

Taxonomy annotation and guide tree errors in 16S rRNA databases

Metadata in the BioSample Online Repository are Impaired by Numerous Anomalies

Assessing the relative importance of the biophysical properties of amino acid substitutions associated with human genetic disease