?Wrap in Shadow?s Light?: Spenser and the Art of the Miniature
Tianhu Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0895769x.2018.1543576
2019-01-01
Abstract:In England, the sonnet form flourished in 1580–1610 (Spiller 1), which nearly coincided with the maturity of miniature painting, or limning, whose foremost Elizabethan practitioner was Nicholas Hilliard (1547–1619). Patricia Fumerton has shown the close parallels and interconnections between the two sister arts (1986, 1990). InAmoretti (Oram et al.), Spensermakes a literal reference to a miniature of his love (sonnet 85: “Deepe in the closet of my parts entire,/her worth is written with a golden quill”), enumerates the “pretious things” used by Hilliard in limning (sonnet 15: sapphire, ruby, pearl, ivory, gold, silver; the speaker could be looking at his love’s miniature), and even enters into a technical detail of limning (sonnet 17: “least trembling it his workmanship should spill”). In particular, a brief comparison of Spenser with other sonneteers may clarify Spenser’s divergent uses of light and shadow in his poetry and reveal the sociopolitical, and even psychological, motivation of his departure. Spenser did not win the queen’s direct favor until after the publication of the first three books of The Faerie Queene (1590, abbreviated as FQ henceforth), and the descriptions in his pastoral Colin Clouts Come Home Againe (1595) suggest his disillusionment with the courtly life. At least when writing FQ, therefore, Spenser is best thought of as an “out-of-court poet.” Spenser’s identity as a “want-to-be” courtier poet would be, of course, short-lived, but its effects remain visible in his work. Denial (or self-denial) of access to the court casts a large shadow, both metaphorically and literally, on the works of out-of-court professional poets such as Daniel, Drayton, Shakespeare, and Spenser. It seems significant that the word shadow or any of its derivative forms is absent from the prominent courtier Sir Philip Sidney’s Astrophil and Stella. It, however, appears repeatedly in the sonnet sequences of Daniel, Drayton, Shakespeare, and Spenser. On the other hand, the word light occurs most frequently in Sidney among the five sonneteers (Donow). Though more complicated, the case of Sidney’s niece Lady Mary Wroth and her sonnet sequence Pamphilia to Amphilanthus (1621) also corroborates this general rule. True court poets live in the sun, and potential shadows are illuminated and eliminated by the Monarch’s presence. But kept from the full glare of the monarch’s light, one lives in a world of shadow. Spenser’s recurrent anxiety for his shadowing method, which is so intense as to arouse Sir Walter Raleigh’s offering of consolation, bespeaks his anxiety for his sociopolitical status. “[S]hadowes in pictures weare indeed caused by the shadow of the place,” comments Hilliard the courtier suggestively (29). In Raleigh’s case, perhaps he lived “too much in the sun” (Hamlet, 1.2.67). Hilliard had been Elizabeth’s favorite limner since 1572 and had the queen sit for a miniature many times. In hisATreatise Concerning the Arte of Limning (ca. 1600), Hilliard records the queen’s preference for the “oppen light” rather than the “shadow of place” for a portrait. Presumably partly because of her keen feeling of the intrusive “shadow” in her love, Elizabeth chose to be limned “in the open ally of a goodly garden, where no tree was neere, nor anye shadowe at all” (Hilliard 1983, 28–29). In view of the queen’s special identity, her rejection of “anye shadowe” carries not merely physical, personal, and psychological implications but also sociopolitical, moral-religious, and ideological ones (Leslie 1990, 97).