Abstract:In Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller ('Voller') the Australian High Court held that media companies maintaining Facebook comment pages could be liable for the defamatory posts of commenters on those sites. The decision focussed entirely on whether, by maintaining the Facebook page, the companies had 'published' the statements of commenters. Hearings on other aspects of the tort litigation continue. This paper considers the implications of the tort of defamation on public participation on political will formation where, as is increasingly the case, the participation occurs virtually. Australian law has already tackled the law of defamation as a threat to freedom of political communication; Voller continues the jurisprudence by considering whether hosting an online forum for debate amounts to publication. The more recent High Court judgment in Google LLC v Defteros demonstrated the necessity of the law to align the 'acts' necessary to found legal action with the new environment of automated search engines. The troubled intersection of dematerialised practices of political and cultural discourse and jurisdictionally bound laws of defamation challenges participatory governance as tribes form and dissolve and shift between geographical interests. Defamation in Australia is a tort of strict liability; and, absenting applicable defences, any participation in communication is sufficient to make that participant a publisher and a party to the defamation. The online environment stretches words across geographical and jurisdictional boundaries, but it also stretches and contorts concepts of fault and responsibility. Participatory digital cultural practices integrating users in the creation of cultural heritage simultaneously draw participants into transgressions, both cultural and legal, which are amplified by the medium. Questions of collective guilt, 'shades' of moral responsibility and disproportionality between blameworthiness and legal liability challenge laws formulated for the printing press but now deployed in the online environment. In this way the digitized participatory environment presents deep challenges to law and legal systems, which are chained to geography. This paper considers the concept of innocent publication in the context of the digitized participatory environment and the way in which the virtual experience is dissolving concepts of geographically defined jurisdictions.

The criminal trial as a live event: Exploring how and why live blogs change the professional practices of judges, defence lawyers and prosecutors

Research on the Online Live Broadcasts of Criminal Trial: An Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaire Survey

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Between a ‘media circus’ and ‘seeing justice being done’: Metajournalistic discourse and the transparency of justice in the debate on filming trials in British newspapers

Live Broadcasting the Courtroom: A Field Experiment in Real Trials

Social Media Jurors: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Online Public Engagement in reference to Legal Cases

Is Trial Fairness Affected in Live Broadcast? Preliminary Evidence from a Court in China

The Law of Live Streaming: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of German Legal Framework

Finnish district judges' assessments of live versus video‐mediated party statements in court

Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice

Digitised Justice: The New Two Tiers?

Negotiating Professional News Judgment and “Clicks”

“It’s Like POOF and It’s Gone”: The Live-Streaming of Child Sexual Abuse

An Exploration of User and Bystander Attitudes About Mobile Live-Streaming Video

The Theatre of Surgery: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Live Surgeries

How Does Courtroom Broadcasting Influence Public Confidence in Justice? The Mediation Effect of Vicarious Interpersonal Treatment

Access to Online Courts: Exploring the Relationship between Legal and Digital Capability

Automating Transparency Mechanisms in the Judicial System Using LLMs: Opportunities and Challenges

Method and ethics in advancing jury research

The Media as a Judicial and Police Resource

'Mind-forg'd Manacles': Virtual Experience and Innocent Publication