Abstract:Background and aim A plateau in oxygen uptake ( V ̇ O 2 ) during an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to volitional exhaustion appears less likely to occur in special and clinical populations. Secondary maximal oxygen uptake ( V ̇ O 2 max ) criteria have been shown to commonly underestimate the actual V ̇ O 2 max . The verification phase protocol might determine the occurrence of ‘true’ V ̇ O 2 max in these populations. The primary aim of the current study was to systematically review and provide a meta-analysis on the suitability of the verification phase for confirming ‘true’ V ̇ O 2 max in special and clinical groups. Secondary aims were to explore the applicability of the verification phase according to specific participant characteristics and investigate which test protocols and procedures minimise the differences between the highest V ̇ O 2 values attained in the CPET and verification phase. Methods Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and EMBASE) were searched using specific search strategies and relevant data were extracted from primary studies. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were systematically reviewed. Meta-analysis techniques were applied to quantify weighted mean differences (standard deviations) in peak V ̇ O 2 from a CPET and a verification phase within study groups using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses investigated the differences in V ̇ O 2 max according to individual characteristics and test protocols. The methodological quality of the included primary studies was assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist to obtain a level of evidence. Participant-level V ̇ O 2 data were analysed according to the threshold criteria reported by the studies or the inherent measurement error of the metabolic analysers and displayed as Bland-Altman plots. Results Forty-three studies were included in the systematic review, whilst 30 presented quantitative information for meta-analysis. Within the 30 studies, the highest mean V ̇ O 2 values attained in the CPET and verification phase protocols were similar (mean difference = -0.00 [95% confidence intervals, CI = -0.03 to 0.03] L·min -1 , p = 0.87; level of evidence, LoE: strong). The specific clinical groups with sufficient primary studies to be meta-analysed showed a similar V ̇ O 2 max between the CPET and verification phase ( p > 0.05, LoE: limited to strong). Across all 30 studies, V ̇ O 2 max was not affected by differences in test protocols ( p > 0.05; LoE: moderate to strong). Only 23 (53.5%) of the 43 reviewed studies reported how many participants achieved a lower, equal, or higher V ̇ O 2 value in the verification phase versus the CPET or reported or supplied participant-level V ̇ O 2 data for this information to be obtained. The percentage of participants that achieved a lower, equal, or higher V ̇ O 2 value in the verification phase was highly variable across studies (e.g. the percentage that achieved a higher V ̇ O 2 in the verification phase ranged from 0% to 88.9%). Conclusion Group-level verification phase data appear useful for confirming a specific CPET protocol likely elicited V ̇ O 2 max , or a reproducible V ̇ O 2 p e a k , for a given special or clinical group. Participant-level data might be useful for confirming whether specific participants have likely elicited V ̇ O 2 max , or a reproducible V ̇ O 2 p e a k , however, more research reporting participant-level data is required before evidence-based guidelines can be given. Trial registration PROSPERO ( CRD42021247658 ) https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero .

Training status affects between-protocols differences in the assessment of maximal aerobic velocity

The Correlation between Running Economy and Maximal Oxygen Uptake: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Relationships in Highly Trained Distance Runners

Exercise training-induced speeding of V ˙ O 2 kinetics is not intensity domain-specific or correlated with indices of exercise performance

Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming

Comparison of ventilation threshold and heart rate deflection point in fast and standard treadmill test protocols

Changes in balance ability, power output, and stretch-shortening cycle utilisation after two high-intensity intermittent training protocols in endurance runners

Anthropometric, neuromuscular, physiologic and training variables as determinants to laboratory cycling performance

Confirming the attainment of maximal oxygen uptake within special and clinical groups: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiopulmonary exercise test and verification phase protocols

Effects of high-intensity interval training and resistance training on physiological parameters and performance of well-trained runners: A randomized controlled trial

Effects of Exercise Sequence and Velocity Loss Threshold During Resistance Training on Following Endurance and Strength Performance During Concurrent Training

Adaptations to Optimized Interval Training in Soccer Players: A Comparative Analysis of Standardized Methods for Individualizing Interval Interventions

Increases in the incremental exercise mean response time across the steady state domain: Implications for exercise testing & prescription

Heavy-, Severe-, and Extreme-, but not Moderate-Intensity Exercise Increase V̇o2max and Thresholds after 6 Weeks of Training

Effects of Four Different Velocity-Based Training Programming Models on Strength Gains and Physical Performance

The delta concept does not effectively normalise exercise responses to exhaustive interval training

Effectiveness of maximum, explosive and combined strength training on endurance runners performance indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart Rate Acquisition and Threshold-Based Training Increases Oxygen Uptake at Metabolic Threshold in Triathletes: A Pilot Study

The Effect of Strength Training on Performance Indicators in Distance Runners

Physiological and Anthropometric Differences Among Endurance, Strength, and High-Intensity Functional Training Participants: A Cross-Sectional Study

Velocity-Based Training Affects Function, Strength, and Power in Persons with Parkinson's Disease

Could middle- and long-distance running performance of well-trained athletes be best predicted by the same aerobic parameters?