Improving aquaculture governance: what is the status and options?
B. Satia,P. Bueno,C. Brugere,R. Subasinghe,N. Hishamunda,S. Sen,D. Percy,G. Gooley,D. Bartley,S. D. Silva,M. Halwart,P. Sorgeloos,C. Mohan,J. R. Arthur,N. Ridler,B. Kuemlangan
Abstract:This paper examines aquaculture governance from a global perspective, looking at its current status and the role of governments in administering and regulating aquaculture, including licence procedures, possible strategies and policy instruments. It also looks at the role and responsibilities of other stakeholders, such as industry, non-governmental organizations and communities. Over the past decade, considerable progress has been made in addressing aquaculture governance issues. For example, many governments worldwide utilize the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF), particularly its Article 9. They also use the FAO published guidelines for reducing administrative burdens and for improving planning and policy development in aquaculture, and several countries have defined adequate national aquaculture development laws, policies, strategies and plans. Moreover, individual countries have used best management practices (BMPs) and manuals on farming techniques which have * Corresponding author: nathanael.hishamunda@fao.org Global Conference on Aquaculture 2010 – Farming the Waters for People and Food 234 been promoted by industry organizations and development agencies. The aim is to ensure an orderly and sustainable sector development. However, aquaculture governance remains an issue in many countries. Some of its manifestations include conflicts over marine sites, disease outbreaks that could have been prevented, a widespread public mistrust of aquaculture in certain countries, inability of small-scale producers to meet foreign consumers’ quality standard requirements and inadequate development of the sector in certain jurisdictions despite favourable demand and supply conditions. There are other key observations that emerge from this global perspective of aquaculture governance. Firstly, the importance of governance cannot be overstated. It is as critical to successful aquaculture as feed, seed, capital and technology. Without good governance aquaculture operations will not appear or will not last. Markets and inputs may exist, but unless there are individuals willing to spend time and money, and take on risks, aquaculture operations will not endure. Secondly, private-sector entrepreneurs are the drivers behind durable aquaculture. Their operations may be capital intensive or low-input intensive, but their motivation is risk-adjusted net income, as with agriculture. Hence, secure exclusive rights to the property and proceeds, including protection from arbitrary confiscation of farms, are among the minimum conditions for private-sector investment. Such property rights are among the factors that underpin an “enabling environment”. Other factors include economic and political stability, the rule of law, low levels of corruption, and effectiveness and efficiency of government services. If they are in place, and markets and inputs exist, entrepreneurs are more likely to invest in aquaculture. Thirdly, the behaviour of entrepreneurs must be circumscribed. This can be done by economic incentives, peer pressure or regulations. The ideal would be for self-regulation, because then entrepreneurs’ sense of corporate governance would value all stakeholders, including future generations. Unfortunately, experience has demonstrated that many entrepreneurs will ignore negative externalities in their pursuit of profits. Hence, their behaviour must be modified so their interests are reconciled with those of society. In addition, there are problems in society that are not of farmers’ own making and cannot be mitigated even by responsible practices. These problems – usually the result of social dysfunctions – also underline the need for regulation. Finally, because the goal of aquaculture governance is to maintain a sustainable industry, the three observations above must be acknowledged by policy-makers. Not only must an enabling environment permit entrepreneurs to create a profitable and competitive industry, mitigate or avoid negative externalities and be granted the social licence to operate, but also policy-makers must learn from best practices elsewhere and implement them. The industry also has an important responsibility to work with policy and rulemakers so that regulations, especially, are not excessively restrictive and prone to circumvention. Mariculture governance will require particular attention.
Business,Environmental Science,Political Science