Biological organicism and the ethics of the human-nature relationship

Christoph Rehmann-Sutter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-000-0021-5

2000-11-01

Theory in Biosciences

Abstract:Descriptions of living objects represent relationships between those doing the describing and the living objects: describing is performing a relationship. The relationship, and therefore the description, matters ethically. This is explored in this article as a ‘hermeneutic approach’ to the phenomenon of describing.Historically, the term ‘organism’ seems to have been introduced by Georg Ernst Stahl in 1708, as a contrast to ‘mechanism’, making reference to the Aristotelian use of ‘organon’ to explain the functions of body parts. Neither author can be taken as supporting technomorphic models; they did not use ‘organon’/‘organism’ in the context of a machine metaphor. Today, ‘organism’ can be used either in the emphatic sense to qualify living beings ontologically as transcending every mechanistic description, or to point to the machine model itself and imply a claim against materialistic reductionism, since an autonomy of systemic properties arises only with organisation. The author characterises the ontological discussion by its ethical implications for the human-nature relationship and suggests a position claiming that organisms are ontologically irreducible entities.

biology,mathematical & computational biology