Results of Compliant Participation in Five Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Flavia Baldacchini,Lauro Bucchi,Orietta Giuliani,Silvia Mancini,Alessandra Ravaioli,Rosa Vattiato,Paolo Giorgi Rossi,Cinzia Campari,Debora Canuti,Enza Di Felice,Francesca Mezzetti,Priscilla Sassoli de Bianchi,Stefano Ferretti,Fabio Falcini,Emilia-Romagna Region Workgroup for Colorectal Screening Evaluation,Chiara Ventura,Americo Colamartini,Dario Signorelli,Giovanni Aragona,Francesca Pennini,Giorgio Chiaranda,Pietro Seghini,Cristian Dalla Fiora,Claudio Fattibene,Maria Michiara,Paolo Orsi,Lucia Mangone,Romano Sassatelli,Giuliano Carrozzi,Federica Rossi,Pasqualina Esposito,Paolo Trande,Simona Viani,Luigi Ricciardiello,Vincenzo Cennamo,Giovanna Gualandi,Licia Caprara,Margherita De Lillo,Aldo De Togni,Caterina Palmonari,Daniela Pasquali,Giorgio Zoli,Serena Dal Re,Chiara Petrini,Monica Serafini,Omero Triossi,Benedetta Vitali,Mara Gallinucci,Claudia Imolesi,Mauro Palazzi,Carlo Fabbri,Coralba Casale,Mauro Giovanardi,Daniele Trombetti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.038
Abstract:Background & aims: We investigated the magnitude and temporal patterns of the decreasing trend in main performance measures of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) observed in second and subsequent rounds. Methods: We followed up 494,187 participants from the first round of a regional biennial FIT screening program in Italy (cut-off value for positivity, 20 μg hemoglobin/g feces) for 5 total rounds (2005-2016). At each round, only compliant participants were eligible. Performance measures from the first, third, fourth, and fifth rounds were compared with those from the second round (the first incidence round) using rate ratios from multivariate Poisson regression models and relative risk ratios from multinomial logistic regression models. Results: Between the second and the third rounds, a significant 20% to 30% decrease was found in the proportion of men with a positive FIT result (from 5.2% to 4.3%) and in detection rates of advanced adenoma (from 13.4 to 10.2 per 1000), CRC (from 1.7 to 1.4 per 1000), and advanced neoplasia (from 15.1 to 11.6 per 1000). Positive predictive values (PPVs) decreased by 10% or less between the second and third rounds. Detection rates and PPVs for adenoma stabilized by the fourth and fifth rounds. The PPVs for advanced adenoma, CRC, and advanced neoplasia decreased slightly in men and women by the fourth and fifth rounds. The detection rate of proximal colon cancer stabilized after the second round, whereas the detection rate of distal colon cancer decreased until the fourth round in men (from 0.7 to 0.3 per 1000), and the fifth round in women. Conclusions: These findings support the notion that FIT screening prevents progression of a subset of advanced adenomas. Screening intensity could be modulated based on results from previous rounds, with a risk-based strategy.