ITER Magnet Design Criteria and their Impact on Manufacturing and Assembly

C.T.J. Jong,N. Mitchell,J. Knaster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/fusion.2007.4337879

2007-06-01

Abstract:Traditionally, fusion devices look towards fission nuclear codes for their mechanical design standards, although there have been no experimental fusion devices that have gone through a formal regulatory procedure in order to operate. Large Tokamaks have compiled design documentation that includes load definition, structural analysis and assessment but these have not followed a formal code. Although the vacuum vessel and in-vessel components may share some structural issues with PWR fission reactors, there is very little commonality between a PWR vessel and the magnets. Before deciding whether to follow an existing design code (or use elements from it) the background considerations used in both the code and in the magnet design are considered. These consist of factors such as the type of analysis used to find the operating stresses, the operating environment, the characteristic fabrication routes, different alloys and previous experience of failures. It became clear that the following list of particular features of the ITER superconducting magnets reinforce the need for a specific set of design criteria.