COPPER AND BRONZE : THE FAR-REACHING CONSEQUENCES OF METALLURGY
Florin Curta
Abstract:Historians and archaeologists have long viewed the discovery of the metals and the invention of metallurgy as a revolutionary step in the history of humanity. But metallurgy was more than a technical revolution; its invention in the Bronze Age was primarily a social revolution. This chapter introduces the technological innovations associated with smelting and casting, and the economic and social problems that came with the development of metallurgy. At the same time, the chapter highlights the role of trade and its connection to the rise of metallurgical, proto-industrial centers. The ensuing social and political complexity, disparities, and military conflict are a direct result of that connection and of the competition for resources inherent for metallurgy. Finally, the chapter points to the rise of a class of specialists in society, forerunners to modern engineers. We can make tools, jewelry, toys, kitchenware, furniture, and almost any other item from metal. Useful though metals are, however, they are sometimes less than perfect for the jobs we need them to do. That is why most of the “metals” we use are not actually metals at all but alloys—metals combined with other substances to make them stronger, harder, lighter, or better in some other ways. Copper is good in some ways, but bronze is far better. Choosing copper as topic for this chapter is actually a way to introduce not the discovery of metals, but the invention of metallurgy. Understanding the social implications of introducing those new materials—alloys— is crucial for the engineers of the future, who will find ways of using and improving existing materials, or will come up with new ones. This chapter will therefore explore the consequences of metallurgy from a social and political perspective. 1. The revolutionary role of metals and alloys The revolutionary aspect of discovering the properties of metals and, especially, alloys, has long been recognized. However, the idea that even the (pre)history of humanity could be divided into “ages” on the basis of the materials out of which humans made their tools and weapons is relatively new. It goes back to a Danish archaeologist named Christian Jürgensen Thomsen (1788-1865; Fig. 1).1 He studied Greek and Latin in Paris, and was very fond of the Roman poet Lucretius (99-55 B.C.), the author of a philosophical poem entitled De rerum natura (On the Nature of Things). In that poem, Lucretius describes how the first tools that humans used were “hands, and nails, and teeth, and stones and branches torn from trees,” before they discovered bronze and iron. With bronze, men “tilled the soil” and “roused the waves of war,” before “the sword of iron came forth,” and, as they despised “bronze sickle’s curving blade,” they began to “cleave the earth “ with iron.2 Inspired by Lucretius, Thomsen invented the so-called Three-Age System still used in
History,Materials Science