The effects of LiBOB additive for stable SEI formation of PP13TFSI-organic mixed electrolyte in lithium ion batteries
Yongxin An,Pengjian Zuo,Xinqun Cheng,Lixia Liao,Geping Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.125
IF: 6.6
2011-01-01
Electrochimica Acta
Abstract:A safe electrolyte system is prepared from N -methyl- N -propylpiperidinium bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (PP13TFSI), organic electrolyte (1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC) and lithium bis (oxalato) borate (LiBOB). The additive of LiBOB enhances the stability of interface between electrolyte and anode. The LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes show non-flammability and good compatibility with active materials. The performance of anode for lithium ion battery is successfully improved by LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes, which shows 200 mA h g −1 reversible capacities at 0.3 C rate. The ionic conductivity and the lithium ion transference number in LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes system also suits to application for lithium ion battery. Keywords Ionic liquid Solid electrolyte interphase Electrolyte Safety Li-ion battery 1 Introduction Lithium ion battery is thought as a promising power source for its high voltage, high cycle performance and high energy densities. The increase in improvement of safety is a key point for commercialization of lithium-ion batteries in the auto-mobile application. However, most lithium ion batteries use an organic solvent as electrolyte; the cell temperature at early stage of thermal runaway caused by organic electrolyte burning is thought to be the main reason for the thermal runaway of batteries. So a safe electrolyte needs to be designed in lithium-ion batteries [1,2] . In recent years, ionic liquids (ILs) are widely investigated due to their excellent properties, such as negligible volatility, non-flammability and high thermal stability. ILs also have higher ion conductivity (>10 −3 mS cm −1 ) and wider electrochemistry window, when the properties of high ionic conductivity and electrochemical stability occur simultaneously, ILs electrolytes will be the potential candidates for lithium ion batteries. Compared with tradition organic electrolytes, IL electrolytes have indeed an extraordinary safe character. The use of ILs is expected to provide the lithium battery with the level of safety which is required for large-scale applications such as electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). One difficulty in utilizing ionic liquid for lithium ion batteries is the poor cathodic stability. The most common class of ILs is that formed by the imidazolium cation and TFSI − anion, such as 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) (EMITFSI) which has the higher ion conductivity (1.06 × 10 −2 S cm −1 at 303 K), but this kind IL is usually unstable toward lithium electrode, which is caused by EMI cation [3] . In recent years, pyrrolidine (PY) and piperidine (PP)-based ILs attract people's interest due to their stabilization to lithium [4,5] , the electrochemistry window of these kinds ILs is higher than 5 V and the cathodic potential is about −0.3 V (vs. Li/Li + ), but the poor performance on graphite caused by the unstable electrode/electrolyte interface formed by IL electrolytes, restricts their application in lithium ion batteries, so a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) between the electrolyte and electrode is necessary for IL electrolytes to improve the anode performance, which could be accomplished by appending functional additives in IL-electrolytes system. LiBOB was proposed by Lischka et al. [6] as a promising and advantageous lithium salt for rechargeable lithium ion batteries, instead of the problematic LiPF 6 . LiBOB has many advantages compared with LiPF 6 , including superior thermal stability, increased safety and a more stable SEI. For instance, LiBOB can effectively stabilize the surface of graphite anode even in pure propylene carbonate-based electrolytes [7,8] . Mixed electrolytes comprised of ionic liquid and organic electrolyte have been reported in previous articles [9,10] and the proposed optimal concentration of ionic liquid in mixed electrolyte is 50 vol.%, which shows the no flaming character and good performance in lithium ion battery, but the rate capacity of the cell was still lower for application in practice. In this paper, we prepared an advanced electrolyte composed of 50 vol.% PP13TFSI, 50 vol.% organic electrolyte(1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC, 1:1, v/v) which as a solvent to reduce the IL's viscosity and increase the system conductivity, 2 wt.% LiBOB as an additive to form SEI. It is found that this compound exhibits a relative high rate capacity with good cycling performance. 2 Experimental The structures of lithium salt and ionic liquid studied in this paper are shown in Fig. 1 . The IL here developed, PP13TFSI, was synthesized according to the route as followed: Dissolving LiTFSI and PP13Br (1:1 mole ratio, purchased from Aldrich) separately in deionized H 2 O and the combining gave pure liquid PP13TFSI, which phase separated from the aqueous layer (LiBr was dissolved in the aqueous layer). The PP13TFSI was washed several times with deionized H 2 O. The final aqueous layer was removed and ionic liquid was purified by activated carbon (Cabot). The mixture was dried under vacuum at 100 °C for 24 h and then 130 °C for 6 h. The Br − content was checked by 5 vol.% AgNO 3 solution and water content was below 40 ppm as measured by a Karl Fischer auto-titrator. The resulting PP13TFSI was a clear, colorless liquid at room temperature. The materials were stored and handled in a glove box, and then mixed with 50% volume of 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC (Tianci, Guangzhou), finally 2 wt.% LiBOB (99%, Aldrich) was added in the mixed electrolytes. A 3 μL portion of solution was placed into 20 μL stainless gold sample pan that was then crimp-sealed with a stainless steel lid, the thermal properties of the electrolytes studied in this paper were investigated by differential scanning calorimetric (DSC-Netzsch ST447F5) from 25 to 400 °C at the rate of 5 °C min −1 under argon condition. The electrochemistry window PP13TFSI was measured by cyclic voltammogram (CV) and linear sweep voltammogram. CV and Linear sweep voltammogram were measured on coin cell of Pt |electrolytes| Li at the scan rate of 2 mV s −1 in range of 0–3 V and 3–6 V, respectively. Cyclic voltammogram was measured on half cell of Li/electrolytes/hard carbon–graphite composition. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was also measured on the same cell above mentioned by electrochemical analyzer CHI604B. The ion conductivity of mixed electrolytes with 2 wt.% LiBOB was measured by conductivity meter (Lei-Ci DDS 307). In this paper, a coin cell was used as a charge–discharge test cell. In order to test the electrochemical performance of the cell using 2 wt.% LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes, LiFePO 4 cathode and hard carbon–graphite composite anode were used. The electrodes of cathode were prepared by casting slurry containing 80 wt.% LiFePO 4 (LiKai Taiwan), 10 wt.% acetylene black (AB) and 10 wt.% polyvinylydene fluoride on aluminum foil and dried at 120 °C for 10 h under vacuum, the film was punched into disk with area of 0.95 cm −2 and mass ∼2.0 mg for use as the cathode. Hard carbon as anode material has many merits, especially, hard carbon is stable during charge–discharge cycling in PC and ILs-based electrolytes, but hard carbon suffers from a high irreversible capacity compared with graphite for 1st cycle. In this paper, we used hard carbon and graphite composite material as anode; hard carbon–graphite composite anode was prepared by mechanically mixing the hard carbon (Kureha Corp., Japan) with graphite (MAGD, BTR) at the mass rate 1:2 in a planetary ball mill. The anode sheet consisted of 92 wt.% active materials (hard carbon–graphite composite), 5 wt.% acetylene black (AB), and 3 wt.% poly vinylydene fluoride; samples coated on Cu substrate and preparation of electrodes were also same as the cathode manner, finally, the electrodes of anode were assembled to Li/hard carbon–graphite composite half cells. Cells were subjected to battery test system (NewwareTC51), the charge–discharge voltage of anode materials was between 0.02 and 1.5 V, the charge–discharge voltage of cathode materials was between 2.7 and 4.0 V. The electrodes after 1 charge–discharge cycle were taken out and washed twice with the solvent DMC and then dried under vacuum overnight. A vacuum sample transporter was used to load the dried samples into the XPS sample chamber from glove box atmosphere. Surface analysis was then conducted on those electrodes with a PHI 5800 XPS system, where Al Ka excitation source was used. The resolution of the measurement generally falls within 0.3 eV and the elemental carbon peak at 284.5 eV was used as the internal reference to calibrate the energy position. The surface of electrode washed with DMC and dried in vacuum was observed with scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi S-4700). Fiberglass wicks (4 cm in length, 2 cm in width) were first immersed in the electrolyte, absorbing about 1 g electrolyte. A lighter was used to burn one end of the fiber. After 10 s, the light was removed from under the fiberglass wicks, the electrolyte was judged to be nonflammable if the electrolyte never ignited during the testing, or if the ignition of electrolyte ceased when the flame was removed. Each electrolyte was tested three times. 3 Results and discussion The structures of IL and LiBOB studied in this work are shown in Fig. 1 . Fig. 2 shows the DSC curves of electrolytes. The pure ionic liquid shows the well thermal ability above 400 °C, the peak temperature of electrolytes containing ionic liquid PP13TFSI is 18–24 °C higher than that of 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC. Because the decomposition temperature of LiBOB (314 °C) is lower than that of ionic liquid, the additive of 2 wt.% LiBOB makes the exothermic peaks shift lower in mixed electrolytes system. But compared with 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC, the thermal stability of system is improved by ionic liquid. Fig. 3 shows the CV and Linear sweep of platinum electrode in PP13TFSI electrolytes. From 0 V to 3 V, there is no oxidation and reduction peak were found during the CV process. Linear sweep volatmmogram shows the current keep stable between 3 V and 5.3 V. So we can say the electrochemical window of PP13TFSI is higher than 5 V, which is satisfied with the requirement of lithium ion battery. EIS is widely used to investigate electrolyte–electrode interface reactions [11,12] , such as the electrochemical lithium intercalation reaction in carbonaceous material within the carbonate electrolyte system and the subsequent formation of SEI films [13,14] . Fig. 4 a shows the equivalent circuit to fit the EIS of Li |LiBOB containing mixed electrolytes| composite anode cell at 1 V after 1 cycle, Here, the intercept at the Z Re axis in high frequency refers to R e , which includes electrolyte solution resistance, electric contacts resistance and ion conductive resistance. The semicircle in the high frequency range corresponds to the surface film resistance ( R f ); the semicircle in the middle frequency range reflects the charge transfer resistance ( R ct ); and the sloping line in the lower frequency represents lithium-ion diffusion resistance in bulk electrode. Fig. 4 b shows the EIS of Li/hard carbon–graphite composite anode cell using LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes. It can be seen that EIS before and after cycling presents some obvious difference. Before cycling, here is only a depressed semicircle section in EIS. Since the electrode is not activated, the diameter of the semicircle is very large. After 1 cycle, EIS are composed of two partially overlapped and depressed semicircles and a straight slopping line at low frequency end. In the case of LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes, the diameter of the semicircle in the range of high frequencies of the impedance spectra is small before the charge–discharge cycles; the value of R f is 137 Ω. However, R f significantly increases to 400 Ω after the first cycle, which demonstrates the formation of SEI by LiBOB on electrode surface [15,16] , the R f value does not change obviously with cycling, after 20 cycles, the value of R f is constant to 300 Ω, this proves well stability of SEI formed by LiBOB. Fig. 4 b inset shows the EIS of cell using LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes, the impendence of interface is increasing from 400 Ω (after 1 cycle) to 700 Ω (after 20 cycle), which is caused by co-interrelation of PP13 + and the continually electrochemical reactions between the electrolyte/active materials. The mechanism of forming SEI is also proved by the cyclic voltammogram [17] , Cell current and potential of the first two cycle of Li/hard carbon–graphite composite anode cells are shown in Fig. 5 . Two reduction peaks observed at ∼0.6 V and ∼0.2 V vs. Li/Li + are due to intercalation of PP13 + and Li + ions in the graphite for mixed electrolytes without LiBOB ( Fig. 5 a). In contrast, the small cathodic peak at 1.75 V is the SEI formation originated by LiBOB in Fig. 5 b. It is should be the decomposition of LiBOB forms a stable SEI film and reduces the decomposition of PP13TFSI and organic electrolytes, then prevents the co-intercalation of PP13 + . The columbic efficiencies of the first two cycles in two different systems are 66.16% and 78.49%, respectively. XPS technique is very useful in analysis of the composition of the solid surface and it has been used for the analysis of the composition and structure of SEI in the literatures [18,19] . To further analyze the composition and structure of SEI formed on the surface of anodes with different electrolytes; XPS was carried out for cells with LiBOB-containing and LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes. The C1s spectra of the anodes are shown in Fig. 6 a and b , the surface spectra between 282 and 290 eV were deconvoluted and the plot was embedded in the relevant plot. As we can see, the difference between LiBOB-containing sample and LiBOB-free one is obvious. Mixed electrolytes with 2 wt.% LiBOB have an abundance of ROCOOLi characterized by the peak corresponding to 289 eV in C1 s due to the ring-opening of the BOB − anion. This result is in well agreement with previous reports on the chemical composition of SEI formed with LiBOB [20,21] . In comparison with the S2p spectra ( Fig. 6 c and d), the most obvious difference between LiBOB-containing and LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes can be seen. In LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes, the S2p signal shows a rather high intensity, while the relative low peak is found in the spectra of the LiBOB-containing sample. So far as the component of electrolyte, TFSI − is the only source of elemental sulphur, so the serious decomposition of IL is thought to occur in LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes. In contrast, no higher significant decomposition of IL is detected in LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes sample. It can be concluded that LiBOB salt can effectively prevent the ionic liquid-PP13TFSI from further decomposing on the surface of electrode. A pronounced B1s spectrum at 193 eV appears at SEI layers formed in LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes ( Fig. 6 f), confirming LiBOB indeed takes part in the formation of SEI film. A semiquantitative analysis of the XPS spectra is carried out based on atom sensitivity factor. The comparison of atomic concentration of various elements in SEI layers formed in LiBOB-free and LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes are shown in Fig. 7 . The atom concentrations of F, N, and S in SEI layer formed in LiBOB-containing electrolytes are obviously lower than that in LiBOB-free electrolytes, while the concentration of Li is higher than that in LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes. This has positive effect on the properties of SEI layer of anode. Fig. 8 shows SEM images of the hard carbon–graphite composite electrode surfaces after 10 cycles in different electrolytes. The surface morphology of LiBOB-free electrode is still homogeneous compared with the initial electrode (e). However, the anode platelets become thicker and rounder showing the expansion of the carbon particles ( Fig. 8 a and b), the morphology of electrode is similar to that in ILs-system [22,23] . Morphological LiBOB-containing electrode observation shows uniform; the surface of the electrode is covered with the compact film when the LiBOB salt is employed in the mixed electrolytes. Well stability of SEI is formation. (1) t + = i s R s b ( Δ V − i 0 R 0 film ) i 0 R 0 b ( Δ V − i s R s film ) Transference numbers were determined by the method reported by Bruce et al. [24] , which is a direct-current polarization method based on the dc polarization technique. Fig. 9 a shows the chronoamperometric curve of Li |2 wt.% LiBOB in mixed electrolytes| Li cell after 10 mV dc pulse. By fitting the curve, the values of the current can be obtained at the initial polarization time, I 0 and under steady-state conditions, I s . Fig. 9 b shows the impedance of the cell before and after polarization. The two curves practically overlap, which indicates that there is no great difference between the initial R 0 and the final resistance R s of the two Li interfaces. This is an additional confirmation of the stability of the lithium electrode in this kind electrolyte. By inserting the values of I 0 , I s , R 0 and R s in Eq. (1) , the lithium transference number results to be 0.64, i.e. a reasonable value for practical application in lithium batteries, which is higher than pure IL electrolyte-system (about 0.4). This may be the 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC decreases the viscosity of the system. We also tested the ion conductivity of 2 wt.% LiBOB containing PP13TFSI-1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC mixed electrolytes at room temperature; the value is about 5.23 mS cm −1 , close to the value of 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC (8 mS cm −1 ). The cycling properties of Li/LiFePO 4 cell using mixed electrolytes with and without LiBOB at 0.1 C rate are shown in Fig. 10 . The high capacity and reasonable coulomb efficiency can be seen in the cell using LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes. The reversible capacity of Li |2 wt.% LiBOB in mixed electrolytes| FeLiPO 4 half battery is 140 mA h g −1 (84.4% LiFePO 4 special capacity), the value is higher than the cell using LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes (reversible capacity is only 132 mA h g −1 at 0.1 C rate), from the second cycle, the coulomb efficiency increases higher than 99%. When the discharge rate increases to 0.15 C, the reversible capacity also can stabilize to 128 mA h g −1 , while the reversible capacity of cell without LiBOB is only 112 mA h g −1 at same discharge rate. We also tested the cell with the LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes at 1 C rate, similar with other IL electrolytes, the reversible capacity decreases obviously, the decreased reversible capacity is correlation with the poor wetting ability of LiFePO 4 with electrolytes [25] , the additive LiBOB could improve the compatibility between the electrolytes with the LiFePO 4 cathode. The charge–discharge curves of Li |LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes| composite anode are shown in Fig. 11 a . The first charge–discharge capacities are 207 mA h g −1 and 306 mA h g −1 at rate of 0.15 C, coulomb efficiency is 68% for the first cycle. When the charge–discharge rate increases to 0.3 C, the capacity of the cell decreases obviously, the value is lower than 100 mA h g −1 . On the contrary, the initial discharge capacity of the LiBOB-containing cell is 296 mA h g −1 and the charge capacity is 257 mA h g −1 at 0.15 C, which results in coulomb efficiency 86% for the first cycle. Even the charge–discharge rate increases to 0.3 C, the reversible capacity is also higher than 200 mA h g −1 (see Fig. 11 b). Fig. 12 shows the capacity vs. number of cycle for the Li/hard carbon–graphite composite anode cell with different electrolytes. LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes exhibits the better cycle performance and most stable coulomb efficiency after the first cycle, which indicating the decomposition of electrolytes was well hindered in subsequent cycles. The charge capacity is still 255.1 mA h g −1 even after 20 cycles and the capacity retention ratio is 99%, the coulomb efficiency in LiBOB-containing mixed electrolyte-system is higher than free-LiBOB system. The reversible capacity decreases obviously in LiBOB-free mixed electrolytes with cycle number, the charge capacity is only 180.7 mA h g −1 with the capacity retention ratio 87.4% after 20 cycles, the main reason is the poor SEI results in electrolytes decomposing on electrode. The well stability SEI formed by LiBOB is very important to the cell performance with mixed electrolytes. The burning tests on electrolytes are shown in Fig. 13 , the traditional organic electrolytes - 1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC:DEC(1:1, v/v) ignited instantaneously and was completely engulfed in flame, it continued to be of inflammation condition more than 1 min after removal of the lighter. In contrast, the ionic liquid and 1 M LiPF 6 /EC-DEC (1:1, v/v) mixed electrolytes with 2 wt.% LiBOB never became engulfed in flame during the burning test, when the lighter was removed, they exhibited its self-extinguishing characters, non-flaming ability of ionic liquid and high thermal stability of LiBOB played the important role in the mixed electrolytes. The burning test well proved the safety of 2 wt.% LiBOB containing mixed electrolytes. 4 Conclusions A new electrolyte component was obtained through mixing LiBOB, PP13TFSI and organic electrolyte (1 mol L −1 LiPF 6 /EC-DEC). LiBOB additive effectively enhanced the interface stability of the battery. The 2 wt.% LiBOB-containing mixed electrolytes show higher conductivity (5.23 mS cm −1 ) and reasonable lithium ion transference number (0.63) at room temperature. When this kind electrolyte is used for LiFePO 4 /Li cell, the cell exhibits good performance, high reversible capacity (140 mA h g −1 ) with coulomb efficiency close to 100%, even cycling on composite anode materials (hard carbon mixed graphite) at charge–discharge rate 0.3 C, the battery also shows a reversible capacity of 200 mA h g −1 . The mixed electrolytes containing 2 wt.% LiBOB are found to have non-flammability property. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the finance support from 863 Foundation of China (No. 20009AA11A105). References [1] H. Matsumoto H. Sakaebe K. Tatsumi J. Power Sources 146 2005 45 [2] M. Galinski A. Lewandowski I. Stepniak Electrochim. Acta 51 2006 5567 [3] K. Tsunashima M. Sugiya Electrochem. Commun. 9 2007 2353 [4] A. Fernicola F. Croce B. Scrosati J. Power Sources 174 2007 342 [5] H. Sakaebe H. Matsumoto Electrochem. Commun. 5 2003 594 [6] U. Lischka, U. Wietelmann, M.W. German, Pat., DE 19829030C1 (1999). [7] Z. Chen W.Q. Lu J. Liu K. Amine Electrochim. Acta 51 2006 3322 [8] W.Q. Lu Z.H. Chen H. Joachin J. Power Sources 163 2007 1074 [9] A. Guerfi M. Dontigny P. Charest M. Petitclerc M. Lagace A. Vigh K. Zaghib J. Power Sources 195 2010 845 [10] H. Nakagawa Y. Fujino S. Kozono Y. Katayama T. Nukuda H. Sakaebe H. Matsumoto J. Power Sources 174 2007 1021 [11] K. Xu S.S. Zhang R. Jow J. Power Sources 143 2005 197 [12] D.P. Abraham M.M. Furczon S.H. Kang D.W. Dees A.N. Jansen J. Power Sources 180 2008 612 [13] M. Itagaki S. Yotsuda N. Kobari N. Koabari K. watanabe S. Kinoshita M. Ue Electrochim. Acta 51 2006 1629 [14] J.Y. Song H.H. Lee Y.Y. Wang J. Power Sources 111 2002 255 [15] J. WChoia G. Cheruvallya D.S. Kim J. Power Sources 183 2008 441 [16] L.B. Chen K. Wang X.H. Xie J.Y. Xie J. Power Sources 174 2007 538 [17] M. Lu H. Cheng Y. Yang Electrochim. Acta 53 2008 3539 [18] L.W. Zhao J.I. Yamaki M. Egashira J. Power Sources 174 2007 352 [19] N.S. Choi K.H. Yew H. Kim S.S. Kim J. Power Sources 172 2007 404 [20] K. Xu U. Lee S.S. Zhang Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 6 2003 A144 [21] S. Santee A. Xiao L. Yang J. Power Sources 194 2009 1053 [22] H.H. Zheng B. Li Y.B. Fu Electrochim. Acta 52 2006 1556 [23] C.K. Chan R. Ruffo S.S. Hong Y. Cui J. Power Sources 189 2009 1132 [24] P.G. Bruce J. Evans C.A. Vincent Solid State Ionics 918 1988 28 [25] J. Hassoun A. Fernicola M.A. Navarra S. Panero B. Scrosati J. Power Sources 195 2010 574