Abstract:This longitudinal study explores persistence in research productivity at the individual level over academic lifetime: can highly productive scientists maintain relatively high levels of productivity. We examined academic careers of 2326 Polish full professors, including their lifetime biographical and publication histories. We studied their promotions and publications between promotions (79,027 articles) over a 40-year period across 14 science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) disciplines. We used prestige-normalized productivity in which more weight is given to articles in high-impact than in low-impact journals, recognizing the highly stratified nature of academic science. Our results show that half of the top productive assistant professors continued as top productive associate professors, and half of the top productive associate professors continued as top productive full professors (52.6% and 50.8%). Top-to-bottom and bottom-to-top transitions in productivity classes occurred only marginally. In logistic regression models, two powerful predictors of belonging to the top productivity class for full professors were being highly productive as assistant professors and as associate professors (increasing the odds, on average, by 179% and 361%). Neither gender nor age (biological or academic) emerged as statistically significant. Our findings have important implications for hiring policies: hiring high- and low-productivity scientists may have long-standing consequences for institutions and national science systems as academic scientists usually remain in the system for decades. The Observatory of Polish Science (100,000 scientists, 380,000 publications) and Scopus metadata on 935,167 Polish articles were used, showing the power of combining biographical registry data with structured Big Data in academic profession studies.

“Physicists” and “lyricists”: Whom the Russian labor market values higher?

Professionals’ Identification Within and Across Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields

Where Do STEM Majors Lose Their Advantage? Contextualizing Horizontal Stratification of Higher Education in Urban China

The Effect of the Field of Study on the Higher Education Wage Premium — Evidence from Israel

Does knowing foreign language pay off in the Russian labor market?

Earnings Dynamics, Changing Job Skills, and STEM Careers*

Can successful female STEM graduates contribute to narrowing the gender pay gap in the EU?

College location and labor market outcomes for STEM graduates in the US

The Rise of the Useless: the Case for Talent Diversity

Quantifying Lifetime Productivity Changes: A Longitudinal Study of 320,000 Late-Career Scientists

Moving along the STEM pipeline? The long-term employment patterns of science, technology, engineering and maths graduates in the United Kingdom

The Young and the Old, the Fast and the Slow: A Large-Scale Study of Productivity Classes and Rank Advancement

Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities

Skill levels and gains in university STEM education in China, India, Russia and the United States

Are Scientists Changing their Research Productivity Classes When They Move Up the Academic Ladder?

Cross-Cultural Patterns of Gender Differences in STEM: Gender Stratification, Gender Equality and Gender-Equality Paradoxes

Science for All? School Science Education Policy and STEM Skills Shortages

Young Male and Female Scientists: A Quantitative Exploratory Study of the Changing Demographics of the Global Scientific Workforce

Community College Scientists and Salary Gap: Navigating Socioeconomic and Academic Stratification in the U.S. Higher Education System

Once highly productive, forever highly productive? Full professors' research productivity from a longitudinal perspective

Heterogeneous Major Preferences for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice