Abstract:Background/Context: The underrepresentation of students from lower socioeconomic status (LSES) backgrounds among college graduates with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees, and consequently in STEM occupations, is a concern with respect to reducing, perpetuating, or increasing social inequality. The loss of their talent and creativity also poses a threat to the future of the U.S. economy, scientific knowledge generation, and national security. This study uses two theoretical frameworks—bounded rationality and effectively maintained inequality (EMI)—to identify the pathways toward STEM for students from lower and higher SES backgrounds, given the well-documented differences in their family resources and opportunities to learn, amount of cultural capital, and risk aversions. Purpose: The study identifies factors related to LSES students’ odds of declaring and graduating with a STEM degree and tests whether those factors work in similar ways for students from higher socioeconomic groups. The study contributes to understanding the roots of the underrepresentation of LSES students in STEM majors and occupations. Research Design: We use a mixed-method sequential explanatory design that draws from two complementary sources of data, one quantitative and one qualitative. Using multilevel logit models, the quantitative data set explores how SES influences students’ choices regarding whether to pursue a STEM degree. The qualitative data set further explores the relationships found in the quantitative data specifically for the case of LSES students through analysis of in-depth interviews. Findings: Quantitative analysis finds that LSES students’ socioeconomic background is related to their reduced opportunities to learn and reduced information resources, lessening their adequate academic preparation for success in STEM majors. Qualitative data indicate that risk avoidance—specifically, perceptions of risk and ideas of future income stability—play an important role in LSES students’ decisions to major in STEM. In addition, LSES students possess insufficient data to make informed decisions while in high school regarding course selection that would better enable their pathways into STEM, and to navigate into college success. Conclusions: To foster equity in access to postsecondary educational resources, it is crucial to offer all students access to high-quality academic opportunities before enrolling in college. Furthermore, high schools must ensure that students have access to explicit information about college and what various majors entail. We advocate that all students should have information on all options available so they can make well-informed decisions that match their abilities and preferences. Students’ access to and preferences for certain majors should not be conditioned on their socioeconomic background.

Where Do STEM Majors Lose Their Advantage? Contextualizing Horizontal Stratification of Higher Education in Urban China

Economic Consequences of Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Evidence from Urban China

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Science or Liberal Arts? Cultural Capital and College Major Choice in China.

College Major Choice and Gender Difference in Entering Male-Dominated Occupations:Evidence from Beijing College Student Panel Survey

Community College Scientists and Salary Gap: Navigating Socioeconomic and Academic Stratification in the U.S. Higher Education System

Cross-Cultural Patterns of Gender Differences in STEM: Gender Stratification, Gender Equality and Gender-Equality Paradoxes

Do Family Privileges Bring Gender Equality? Instrumentalism and (De) Stereotyping of STEM Career Aspiration among Chinese Adolescents

Heterogeneous Major Preferences for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice

Master’s Education in STEM Fields in China: Does Gender Matter?

Urban Education Differentiation and Its Socio-Economic Consequences: an Internet–survey-Based Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of New White Collar Workers in Nanjing, China

Changes in College Attainment and the Economic Returns to A College Degree in Urban China, 2003-2010: Implications for Social Equality

Entrenched Inequalities? Class, Gender and Ethnic Differences in Educational and Occupational Attainment in England

The impact of college experience on female students' self-perceived employability in STEM majors

College is A Rich, Han, Urban, Male Club: Research Notes from A Census Survey of Four Tier One Colleges in China

Socioeconomic Differences in North Carolina College Students’ Pathways Into STEM

What Enables the “meritocratic Power” of a College Degree? Changing Labor Market Outcomes of First-Generation College Graduates in Post-Revolution China

Creating Our Gendered Selves—College Experiences, Work and Family Plans, Gender Ideologies, and Desired Work Amenities Among STEM Graduates

Access to Elite Education , Wage Premium , and Social Mobility : Evidence from China ’ S College Entrance Exam

The wage structure and gap between public and private sectors: an empirical study in urban China

Getting Ahead in Urban China