Where are the cosmic metals at z∼ 3?

Jesper Sommer‐Larsen,Johan P. U. Fynbo,Jesper Sommer-Larsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12618.x

IF: 4.8

2008-02-21

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract:The global temperature distribution of the cosmic gas‐phase oxygen at z∼ 3 is determined by combining high‐resolution cosmological simulations of individual protogalactic as well as larger regions with the observed, extinction‐corrected, rest‐frame V‐band galaxy luminosity function. The simulations have been performed with three different stellar initial mass functions (IMFs), a Kroupa (K98), a Salpeter (S) and an Arimoto–Yoshii (AY), spanning a range of a factor of 5 in chemical yield and specific supernova type II energy feedback. Gas‐phase oxygen is binned according to T as log(T) ≲ 4.0 (‘cold’), log(T) ∼ 4.5 (‘warm’) and log(T) ∼ 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0 (‘hot’ phases). Oxygen is found to be distributed over all T phases, in particular for the top‐heavy AY IMF. But, at variance with previous works, it is found that for the K98 and S IMFs the cold phase is the most important. For these IMFs it contains 47 and 37 per cent, respectively, of all gas‐phase oxygen, mainly at fairly high density, nH≳ 0.1 cm−3. The implications of this in relation to observational damped Lyα absorber studies are discussed. In relation to ‘missing metals’ it is found that a significant fraction of the oxygen is located in a warm/hot phase that may be very difficult to detect. Moreover, it is found that less than about 20–25 per cent of the cosmic oxygen is associated with galaxies brighter than MV∼−22, i.e. the faintest galaxy luminosities probed by current metallicity determinations for Lyman‐break galaxies (LBGs). Hence, 75–80 per cent of the oxygen is also in this sense ‘missing’. From the LBG‐based, λ∼ 1500Å ultraviolet luminosity density history at z≥ 3, we obtain an essentially IMF‐independent constraint on the mean oxygen density at z= 3. We compare this to what is obtained from our models, for the three different IMFs. We find that the K98 IMF is strongly excluded, as the chemical yield is simply too small, the Salpeter is marginally excluded, and the AY matches the constraint well. The K98 IMF can only match the data if the λ∼ 1500Å extinction corrections have been overestimated by factor of ∼4, which seems highly unlikely. The yields for K98 are also far too small to match the observational data for C iv. The optimal IMF should have a yield intermediate between the S and AY.

astronomy & astrophysics