Exergy, Exergoeconomic, Life Cycle and Exergoenvironmental Assessments for an Engine Fueled by Diesel–Ethanol Blends with Aluminum Oxide and Titanium Dioxide Additive Nanoparticles

Umit Agbulut,Cuneyt Uysal,Eduardo J.C. Cavalcanti,Monica Carvalho,Mustafa Karagoz,Suat Saridemir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3900930
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:This study develops energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, and sustainability analyses for a compression ignition (CI) engine fueled with neat diesel (D100), 90vol.% neat diesel + 10vol.% ethanol (D90E10), D90E10 + 100 ppm Al2O3 nanoparticle (D90E10Al2O3), and D90E10 + 100 ppm TiO2 nanoparticle (D90E10TiO2). The experiments considered different engine loads (from 3 Nm to 12 Nm, at 3 Nm increments) at a fixed crankshaft speed of 2400 rpm. D90E10Al2O3 presented the highest energy and exergy efficiencies. Regarding exergoeconomics, D100 presented the best results, followed by D90E10Al2O3. The crankshaft work cost flow rate is 0.7645 $/h for D100 and 1.1069 $/h for D90E10Al2O3. As the engine load increased, all environmental impact rates increased due to higher fuel consumption. Increases in the engine load led to decreases in the environmental impact rate per exergy unit. D90E10Al2O3 presented the lowest environmental impact rate of fuel and per exergy unit of power, followed by D90E10TiO2. The results of the sustainability analysis indicated D90E10Al2O3 to be the most sustainable option. D90E10Al2O3 presented the best energy, exergy, exergoenvironmental, and sustainability results and the second-best results regarding exergoeconomics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?