Abstract:Background: Individuals with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability (S-PMID) tend to function at the earlier stages of communication development. Variable and highly individual means of communicating may present challenges to the adults providing support in everyday life. The current study aimed to examine the communication interface between students with S-PMID and educational staff. Method: An in-depth, observational study of dyadic interaction in a class within the secondary part of a special school was conducted. The designated educational level was Key Stage 3 under the National Curriculum of England, which is typically for children from age 11 to 14 years attending a state school. There were four student-teacher dyads in the class. The students had multiple impairments with severely limited communication skills. Video capture of dyadic interaction was conducted during five English lessons and sampled to 2.5 min per dyad per lesson. The video footage was transcribed into standard orthography, detailing the vocal and non-vocal aspects. A coding framework guided by the principles of structural-functional linguistics was used to determine the nature of dyadic interaction, comprising linguistic moves, functions and communicative modalities. The relative contributions of student and teacher to the interaction were examined. Results: Significant differences were found between the students and educational staff on the majority of the measures. The teachers dominated the interaction, occupying significantly more turns than the students. Teacher turns contained significantly more initiations and follow-up moves than the students, who used more response moves. Teacher communication mainly served the functions of requesting and information giving. Feedback and scripted functions were also significantly greater among teacher turns, with only limited occurrence among the students. Self- or shared-expression was greatest among the students. The modalities of speech, touch, singing and objects were used by the teachers for the purpose of communication, whereas vocalisation and gesture were used by the students. Conclusions: Despite differences in the availability of communication skills, both student and teacher were able to make their respective contributions to the interaction during classroom activity. Features of the student-teacher interface retained critical features seen in studies of more able individuals with intellectual disability. Scaffolding provided by teachers appears to be relevant to the communicative contributions of individuals functioning at the earliest stages of communication. The coding framework based on structural-functional linguistics provides some new potential for examining and enhancing the communication interface between individuals with S-PMID and the people who support them.

When big kids don't learn: Contextual modifications and intervention strategies for age 8–18 at-risk students

"Please listen, it's my turn": instructional approaches, curricula and contexts for supporting communication and increasing access to inclusion

Interpretation and Use of Standardized Language Assessments for Diverse School-Age Individuals

Supporting Students With Co-Occurring Language and Behavioral Deficits in the Classroom

Assessing and helping challenging students: Part One, Why do some students have difficulty learning?

Age effects in second language acquisition: Expanding the emergentist account

Language learning impairments: integrating basic science, technology, and remediation

Rethinking Instructional Improvement For Multilingual Learners

Teaching Social Skills Interventions with Digital Cognitive and Language Machines to a Student with Autism

Changing mindsets in the modern foreign languages classroom: an intervention combining intelligence theories and reading strategies

Improving storytelling and vocabulary in secondary school students with language disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions

Using Kindergarten Language, Dialect Variation, and Child Behavior to Predict Second Grade Reading Ability in African American Children

Identifying English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities: Key Challenges and Possible Approaches

Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.

Executive dysfunctions, reading disabilities and speech-language pathology evaluation

Teaching Adolescents with Learning Disabilities to Generate and Use Task-Specific Strategies

Emergent Literacy Support for Children from Marginalised Populations

Unlocking the Promise of Multitiered Systems of Support (MTSS) for Linguistically Diverse Students: Advancing Science, Practice, and Equity

Combining explicit instruction and positive psychology to see adolescents with learning difficulties flourish

Identifying Language Development in Children with ADHD: Differential Challenges, Interventions, and Collaborative Strategies