Abstract:Background: Individuals with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability (S-PMID) tend to function at the earlier stages of communication development. Variable and highly individual means of communicating may present challenges to the adults providing support in everyday life. The current study aimed to examine the communication interface between students with S-PMID and educational staff. Method: An in-depth, observational study of dyadic interaction in a class within the secondary part of a special school was conducted. The designated educational level was Key Stage 3 under the National Curriculum of England, which is typically for children from age 11 to 14 years attending a state school. There were four student-teacher dyads in the class. The students had multiple impairments with severely limited communication skills. Video capture of dyadic interaction was conducted during five English lessons and sampled to 2.5 min per dyad per lesson. The video footage was transcribed into standard orthography, detailing the vocal and non-vocal aspects. A coding framework guided by the principles of structural-functional linguistics was used to determine the nature of dyadic interaction, comprising linguistic moves, functions and communicative modalities. The relative contributions of student and teacher to the interaction were examined. Results: Significant differences were found between the students and educational staff on the majority of the measures. The teachers dominated the interaction, occupying significantly more turns than the students. Teacher turns contained significantly more initiations and follow-up moves than the students, who used more response moves. Teacher communication mainly served the functions of requesting and information giving. Feedback and scripted functions were also significantly greater among teacher turns, with only limited occurrence among the students. Self- or shared-expression was greatest among the students. The modalities of speech, touch, singing and objects were used by the teachers for the purpose of communication, whereas vocalisation and gesture were used by the students. Conclusions: Despite differences in the availability of communication skills, both student and teacher were able to make their respective contributions to the interaction during classroom activity. Features of the student-teacher interface retained critical features seen in studies of more able individuals with intellectual disability. Scaffolding provided by teachers appears to be relevant to the communicative contributions of individuals functioning at the earliest stages of communication. The coding framework based on structural-functional linguistics provides some new potential for examining and enhancing the communication interface between individuals with S-PMID and the people who support them.

"Please listen, it's my turn": instructional approaches, curricula and contexts for supporting communication and increasing access to inclusion

Enhancing language in children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing using augmentative and alternative communication technology strategies

Engaging stakeholders to improve social validity: intervention priorities for students with complex communication needs

Socio-Communicative Behaviors Involving Minimally Speaking Autistic Preschoolers and Their Typically Developing Peers: Effects of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention Package

Teachers' use of augmented input and responsive strategies in schools for students with intellectual disability: A multiple case study of a communication partner intervention

Effects of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention Package on Socio-Communicative Behaviors Between Minimally Speaking Autistic Children and Their Peers

Communication Opportunities for Elementary School Students who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Aided Enhanced milieu teaching to develop symbolic and social communication skills in children with autism spectrum disorder

Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions

Exploring Classroom Factors and Augmentative and Alternative Communication Use in Qualitative Interviews

Experiences of Parents Supporting Their Young Children Who Use Speech-Generating Devices

Communication Partners' Perceptions of Their Roles and Responsibilities in the Design, Planning and Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication With Individuals With Severe or Profound Intellectual Disability: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Inclusive practices for children and youths with communication disorders. Ad Hoc Committee on Inclusion for students with Communication Disorders

Increasing Reciprocal Social Interactions Between Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Peers Using a Collaborative Learning Framework

Supporting successful inclusive practices for learners with disabilities in high schools: a multisite, mixed method collective case study

Turn-taking and communication modes of students and staff in group activities at non-inclusive schools for students with intellectual disability

Teaching partner-focused questions to individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication to enhance their communicative competence

Listen up! perspectives of people of color who use augmentative and alternative communication in the United States

AAC Technologies with Visual Scene Displays and "Just in Time" Programming and Symbolic Communication Turns Expressed by Students with Severe Disability

Peer-Mediated Interventions to Enhance Conversation Skills of Young Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities on a University Campus

The effects of teacher-delivered behavior skills training on paraeducators' use of a communication intervention for a student with autism who uses AAC