Abstract:OBJECTIVE To examine and suggest improvements for deficiencies occurring in the specimen identification and accessioning process in the surgical pathology laboratory. DESIGN Using the College of American Pathologists' and the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' requirements as the standard, each laboratory was asked to prospectively document deficiencies in specimen identification and accessioning for 4 months, or until a maximum of 4000 cases or 400 deficiencies were accrued. PARTICIPANTS Four hundred seventeen laboratories in the College of American Pathologists' voluntary quality improvement program, Q-Probes, participated in this study. RESULTS Identification and accessioning deficiencies were found in 60 042 (6%) out of a total 1 004 115 cases accessioned (median deficiency rate of 3.4%). Errors related to specimen identification accounted for 9.6% of these deficiencies, discrepant or missing information items were present in 77%, and 3.6% involved specimen handling. The most common deficiency was "no clinical history or diagnosis present on the requisition slip," which represented 40% of all deficiencies. Deficiencies were most often detected by the person assigned to accessioning duties or by histology personnel. In 66% of cases, no action was taken to remedy the deficiency, but this varied dramatically according to the specific type of deficiency. An action was taken to remedy deficiencies in 69% of cases involving specimen identification errors, in 58% of specimen handling errors, and in 27% of cases with discrepant or missing information. Peer group stratifiers were associated with a lower deficiency rate. Laboratories with lower numbers (<15 000) of accessioned cases and laboratories with a formal written plan for the detection of errors in accessioning and specimen identification reported lower rates of deficiencies. Factors that correlated with a higher rate of deficiencies included submitting the specimen container and requisition slip in a unique secondary container (P<.005) and labeling the specimen container with only a patient's name or unique patient identification number (as opposed to both identifiers). CONCLUSIONS The majority of deficiencies occurring in surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning are related to missing or inaccurate clinical information. Deficiencies are detected in multiple locations, including areas not typically thought of as quality check points, such as transcription. A variable amount of effort occurs to rectify deficiencies; this effort is largely dependent on the type of deficiency involved. Finally, laboratories with a formal error detection plan had fewer deficiencies.

Identifying Cross Contaminants and Specimen Mix-ups in Surgical Pathology

Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.

From the Operating Theater to the Pathology Laboratory: Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis of the Biological Samples Transfer

Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.

Lost, Mislabeled, and Unsuitable Surgical Pathology Specimens

Pathology Quality Control for Multiplex Immunofluorescence and Image Analysis Assessment in Longitudinal Studies

Bridging the Gap: Exploring the Microbial Influence on Forensic ABO Typing Discrepancies for Enhanced Investigative Accuracy

Clinical-pathologic Correlation: The Impact of Grossing at the Bedside

New solutions to old problems: A practical approach to identify samples with intravenous fluid contamination in clinical laboratories

A comprehensive preanalytical protocol for fresh solid tumor biospecimens

Cleaning protocols in forensic genetic laboratories

Sample Treatment for Tissue Proteomics in Cancer, Toxicology, and Forensics

Surgical specimen handover from the operating theatre to laboratory-Can we improve patient safety by learning from aviation and other high-risk organisations?

Maximizing the clinical utility and performance of cytology samples for comprehensive genetic profiling - A report on the impact of process optimization through the analysis of 4,871 cytology samples profiled by MSK-IMPACT

Quality control for single-cell analysis of high-plex tissue profiles using CyLinter

Quality Control for Single Cell Analysis of High-plex Tissue Profiles using CyLinter

Quality Control of Highly Multiplexed Proteomic Immunostaining with Quantum Dots: Correcting for Crosstalk

Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study

Preanalytic specimen triage: Smears, cell blocks, cytospin preparations, transport media, and cytobanking

Clinical PathoScope: rapid alignment and filtration for accurate pathogen identification in clinical samples using unassembled sequencing data

Root Cause Analysis of Specimen Misidentification in Surgical Pathology Accession and Grossing