Abstract:Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries and lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries are the most widely used power lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in electric vehicles (EVs) currently. The future trend is to reuse LIBs retired from EVs for other applications, such as energy storage systems (ESS). However, the environmental performance of LIBs during the entire life cycle, from the cradle to the grave, has not been extensively discussed. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to quantify and compare the environmental impacts of LFP and NCM batteries. Apart from the phases of production, the first use in EVs, and recycling, the repurposing of retired LIBs and their secondary use in the ESS were also included in the system boundary. Also, the environmental impacts of various recycling processes were evaluated. The LCA results suggested that the NCM battery had better comprehensive environmental performance than the LFP one but shorter service life over the whole life cycle. In China, the first and secondary use phases contributed most to the environmental impacts with electricity mostly generated from fossil fuels. The LIB production phase was relevant to all assessed impact categories and contributed more than 50% to Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP elements) particularly. The environmental loads could be mitigated through the recovery of metals and other materials. And, hydrometallurgy was recommended for recycling waste LIBs by better environmental advantages than pyrometallurgy and direct physical recycling. Sensitivity analysis revealed that by optimizing the charge-discharge efficiency of LIBs, particularly LFP batteries, all environmental burdens could be considerably decreased. Therefore, improving the electrochemical performance of LIBs and increasing the use proportion of clean energy were crucial to reduce the environmental impacts over their entire life cycle.

Estimating stocks and flows of electric passenger vehicle batteries in the Norwegian fleet from 2011 to 2030

Prediction of Battery Return Volumes for 3R: Remanufacturing, Reuse, and Recycling

Material flow analysis for end-of-life lithium-ion batteries from battery electric vehicles in the USA and China

End-of-life or Second-Life Options for Retired Electric Vehicle Batteries

Environmental Benefit Assessment of Second-Life Use of Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries in Multiple Scenarios Considering Performance Degradation and Economic Value

Global material flow analysis of end-of-life of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide batteries from battery electric vehicles

Second Life of Used Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles in the USA

A moving urban mine: The spent batteries of electric passenger vehicles

Does energy storage provide a profitable second life for electric vehicle batteries?

Estimation of end-of-life electric vehicle generation and analysis of the status and prospects of power battery recycling in China

Prediction of metal recovery potential of end-of-life NEV batteries in China based on GRA-BiLSTM

Challenges and Opportunities for Second-life Batteries: A Review of Key Technologies and Economy

Assessment of spent EV batteries for second-life application

Potential for recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in China

Material Flow Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in Europe: Environmental and Economic Implications

Estimation of lithium-ion battery scrap generation from electric vehicles in Brazil

The role of new energy vehicles battery recycling in reducing China's import dependance on lithium resources

Life cycle assessment of secondary use and physical recycling of lithium-ion batteries retired from electric vehicles in China

Second-Life of Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles: Concept, Aging, Testing, and Applications

Battery Electric Vehicles in Commercial Fleets: Use profiles, battery aging, and open-access data

Comparative life cycle assessment of LFP and NCM batteries including the secondary use and different recycling technologies