Abstract:Background: Upper limb impairments in a hemiparetic arm are clinically quantified by well-established clinical scales, known to suffer poor validity, reliability, and sensitivity. Alternatively, robotics can assess motor impairments by characterizing joint dynamics through system identification. In this study, we establish the merits of quantifying abnormal synergy, spasticity, and changes in joint viscoelasticity using system identification, evaluating (1) feasibility and quality of parametric estimates, (2) test-retest reliability, (3) differences between healthy controls and patients with upper limb impairments, and (4) construct validity. Methods: Forty-five healthy controls, twenty-nine stroke patients, and twenty cerebral palsy patients participated. Participants were seated with the affected arm immobilized in the Shoulder-Elbow-Perturbator (SEP). The SEP is a one-degree-of-freedom perturbator that enables applying torque perturbations to the elbow while providing varying amounts of weight support to the human arm. Participants performed either a 'do not intervene' or a resist task. Elbow joint admittance was quantified and used to extract elbow viscosity and stiffness. Fifty-four of the participants performed two sessions to establish the test-retest reliability of the parameters. Construct validity was assessed by correlating system identification parameters to parameters extracted using a SEP protocol that objectifies current clinical scales (Re-Arm protocol). Results: Feasibility was confirmed by all participants successfully completing the study protocol within ~ 25 min without reporting pain or burden. The parametric estimates were good with a variance-accounted-for of ~ 80%. A fair to excellent test-retest reliability was found ([Formula: see text]) for patients, except for elbow stiffness with full weight support ([Formula: see text]). Compared to healthy controls, patients had a higher elbow viscosity and stiffness during the 'do not intervene' task and lower viscosity and stiffness during the resist task. Construct validity was confirmed by a significant (all [Formula: see text]) but weak to moderate ([Formula: see text]) correlation with parameters from the Re-Arm protocol. Conclusions: This work demonstrates that system identification is feasible and reliable for quantifying upper limb motor impairments. Validity was confirmed by differences between patients and controls and correlations with other measurements, but further work is required to optimize the experimental protocol and establish clinical value.

The Modified Tardieu Scale for the measurement of elbow flexor spasticity in adult patients with hemiplegia

Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale in assessing lower limb muscle spasticity

Intersession Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of Myotonometer for Upper and Lower Extremity Muscles in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Measurement of Elbow Spasticity in Stroke Patients Using a Manual Spasticity Evaluator.

Assessment Of Elbow Spasticity With Surface Electromyography And Mechanomyography Based On Support Vector Machine

Reliability of Modified Ashworth Scales Measuring Muscular Tone of Lower Extremities of Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Congenital Muscular Torticollis Severity Classification System

Quantitative Evaluations of Ankle Spasticity and Stiffness in Neurological Disorders Using Manual Spasticity Evaluator.

A Regression-Based Framework for Quantitative Assessment of Muscle Spasticity Using Combined EMG and Inertial Data from Wearable Sensors

Quantitative Elbow Spasticity Measurement Based on Muscle Activation Estimation Using Maximal Voluntary Contraction

Psychometric properties of the modified reaching performance scale in persons with multiple sclerosis

System identification: a feasible, reliable and valid way to quantify upper limb motor impairments

Relative and Absolute Interrater Reliabilities of a Hand-Held Myotonometer to Quantify Mechanical Muscle Properties in Patients with Acute Stroke in an Inpatient Ward

What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise?

Interdisciplinary Consensus in Evaluating the Severity Subscale of the Original and Revised Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Through Video-Based Assessment: An Inter-Rater Reliability Study

Inter and Intra Rater Reliability of the 10 Meter Walk Test in the Community Dweller Adults with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

A Practical Post-Stroke Elbow Spasticity Assessment Using an Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robot: A Validation Study

Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale After Stroke for 13 Muscle Groups

Reliability of a method to assess corticomotor excitability of lower limb muscles using a normalized EMG motor thresholding procedure

Multimodal assessment of spasticity using a point-of-care instrumented glove to separate neural and biomechanical contributions

Correlation between modified trochleocapitellar index and post-traumatic elbow stiffness in type C2-3 distal humeral fractures among adults