Abstract:Introduction Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) affect over 5.7 million Americans and over 35 million people worldwide. Detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early ADRD is a challenge to clinicians and researchers. Brief assessment tools frequently emphasize memory impairment, however executive dysfunction may be one of the earliest signs of impairment. To address the need for a brief, easy-to-score, open-access test of executive function for use in clinical practice and research, we created the Number Symbol Coding Task (NSCT). Methods This study analyzed 320 consecutive patient-caregiver dyads who underwent a comprehensive evaluation including the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), patient and caregiver versions of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS), caregiver ratings of behavior and function, and neuropsychological testing, with a subset undergoing volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Estimates of cognitive reserve were calculated using education, combined indices of education and occupation, and verbal IQ. Psychometric properties of the NSCT including data quality, data distribution, floor and ceiling effects, construct and known-groups validity, discriminability, and clinical profiles were determined. Results The patients had a mean age of 75.3±9.2 years (range 38-98y) with a mean education of 15.7±2.8 years (range 6-26y) of education. The patients had a mean CDR-SB of 4.8±4.7 (range 0–18) and a mean MoCA score of 18.6±7.1 (range 1–30). The mean NSCT score was 30.1±13.8 and followed a normal distribution. All healthy controls and MCI cases were able to complete the NSCT. The NSCT showed moderate-to-strong correlations with clinical and neuropsychological measures with the strongest association (all p’s < .001) for measures with executive components (e.g., Judgement and Problem Solving box of the CDR, Decision Making and Problem Solving domain of the QDRS, Trailmaking B, and Cognigram Attention and Executive Composite Scores). Women slightly outperformed men, and individuals with lower educational attainment and lower education-occupation indices had lower NSCT scores. Decreasing NSCT scores corresponded to older age, worse cognitive scores, higher CDR sum of boxes scores, worse caregiver ratings of function and behavior, worse patient and informant QDRS ratings, and smaller hippocampal volumes and hippocampal occupancy scores. The NSCT provided excellent discrimination (AUC: .866; 95% CI: .82-.91) with a cut-off score of 36 providing the best combination of sensitivity (0.880) and specificity (0.759). Combining the NSCT with patient QDRS and caregiver QDRS ratings improved discrimination (AUC: .908; 95% CI: .87-.94). Discussion The NSCT is a brief, 90-second executive task that incorporates attention, planning and set-switching that can be completed by individuals into the moderate-to-severe stages of dementia. The NSCT may be a useful tool for dementia screening, case-ascertainment in epidemiological or community-based ADRD studies, and in busy primary care settings where time is limited. Combining the NSCT with a brief structured interview tool such as the QDRS may provide excellent power to detect cognitive impairment. The NSCT performed well in comparison to standardized scales of a comprehensive cognitive neurology evaluation across a wide array of sociodemographic variables in a brief fashion that could facilitate its use in clinical care and research.

Korean Version of the Baylor Profound Mental Status Examination: A Brief Staging Measure for Patients with Severe Alzheimer’s Disease

Estimation of diagnostic performance of dementia screening tests: Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing test and Ascertain Dementia 8 questionnaire.

A1362 Bayesian Estimation on Diagnostic Performance of Dementia Screening Tests in the Absence of a Gold Standard

The Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB) for Comprehensive Neuropsychological Assessment

The Discriminant Validity of Single-Question Assessments of Subjective Cognitive Complaints in an Asian Older Adult Population.

Brief risk rating scale: A preliminary screening and monitoring tool emphasizing individual differences for better prognosis in Alzheimer’s disease

A Comparison of Item Characteristics and Test Information Between the K-MMSE~2:SV and K-MMSE

Discriminant Validity and Time‐effectiveness of A Stepwise Dementia Case‐finding Approach in an Asian Elderly Community

A Study on Reliability and Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Eastern China: Preliminary Findings

Clinical evaluation of brief cognitive assessment measures for patients with severe dementia

Alzheimer's Disease Instruments Validation Study in Asia

Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease: Methodology and Baseline Sample Characteristics

Examining the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Performance-Based Test for Alzheimer's Disease Screening

Validity of the Tablet-Based Digital Cognitive Test (SCST) in Identifying Different Degrees of Cognitive Impairment

Simplifying Alzheimer's Disease Monitoring: A Novel Machine-Learning Approach to Estimate the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Box Changes Using the Mini-Mental State Examination and Functional Activities Questionnaire

A screening method for mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals combining bioimpedance and MMSE

P8: Comparison between three cognitive impairment screening tools (MMSE, MoCA and MoCA basic) for seniors with low education in primary care in Brazil

The Number Symbol Coding Task: A brief measure of executive function to detect dementia and cognitive impairment

Chinese Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for Discrimination among Different Severities of Alzheimer's Disease.

Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Index Scores: a Comparison with the Cognitive Domain Scores of the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB)

Usefulness of the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale in inpatient rehabilitation: a retrospective validation study