Abstract:Background: Computer‐assisted instruction in medicine appears to facilitate learning, but it has not been compared prospectively to more traditional teaching methods. Purpose: To compare the efficacy of computer‐assisted instruction to a more traditional format in medical students’ acquisition of clinical acid‐base problem‐solving skills. Methods: 2nd‐year medical students at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine (N = 82) were randomized into 2 groups. Thirty‐seven received computer‐assisted instruction in acid‐base problem‐solving skills, and 45 were enrolled in a teacher‐supervised workshop. Preinstruction and postinstruction questionnaires, as well as a 25‐question test, were administered to all students. Results: Analysis of the preinstruction questionnaire demonstrated that the students’ preferred method of learning was the teacher supervised workshop (50%) followed by reading (39.5%). Fifty‐eight percent of the students did not use computers at all. Of the remaining 42%, average computer use was 5.9 days per month. At the end of the course, both groups felt equally prepared for the test. When asked, “If you had a choice to learn the material again, which would you choose: workshop, reading, or computer‐assisted instruction?”; 93% of the supervised‐workshop group chose the workshop, whereas 53% of the computer‐assisted instruction group chose computer‐assisted instruction (p < .001). No significant difference between the groups was demonstrated in performance on postinstruction recall questions. We did, however, find a significant difference favoring the workshop group in postinstruction problem‐solving skills (p = .04). Conclusions: Computer‐assisted instruction can be as effective as a teacher‐supervised workshop in transmitting clinical acid‐base knowledge skills to medical students. The students, however, do not appear inclined to rely solely on computer programs for learning and seem to benefit from teacher‐student interaction in learning problem‐solving skills.

The use of computerized Learning in intensive care: an evaluation of a new teaching program

Learning curves and long-term outcome of simulation-based thoracentesis training for medical students

A comparison of interactive computerized medical education software with a more traditional teaching format

Comparison of traditional and interactive teaching methods in a UK emergency department

Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: a six-year study

Significant increase in factual knowledge with web-assisted problem-based learning as part of an undergraduate cardio-respiratory curriculum

Evaluating a computer-based experiential learning simulation: a case study using criterion-referenced testing

Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption.

Computer-aided auscultation learning system for nursing technique instruction

Creating a smart classroom in intensive care using assisted reality technology

Evaluating computer assisted learning for renal patients

The Establishment and Application of Case Database of Critical Illness in Anethesia Teaching Pro-Gram

Weekly flipped classroom modules in intensive care medical training: Feasibility and acceptance

Online learning in thoracic surgical training: promising results of multi-institutional pilot study

Learning-by-Concordance of Perception: A Novel way to Learn to Read Thoracic Images

The use of natural language entry and laser videodisk technology in CAI

MORE INTELLIGENCE IN THE NEWBORN ICU: A COMPUTER ASSISTED MONITORING SYSTEM

Utilising computer based learning to complement class teaching of gross anatomy

Clinical dyspnea scenario: Using high-fidelity situation simulation teaching program to evaluate learning effectiveness for clinical junior and pre-clinical nurses

E-simulation: preregistration nursing students' evaluation of an online patient deterioration program

A computer-based, problem-solving system of instruction in clinical pharmacology