Abstract:Environmental flow is the quantity, timing, and quality of water flows required to sustain freshwater and estuarine ecosystems and the human livelihoods and well-being that depend on these ecosystems. Environmental flows (e-flows) are crucial parameters for ecosystem restoration. Understanding the effects of spatial variation in the hydrological and water quality factors on e-flows aids the determination of recovery prior areas and helps to improve the success rate of ecosystem restoration projects. However, few studies have investigated the effects, which severely hinder the restoration of aquatic ecosystems and the sustainable use of water resources in inland waters. This paper therefore presents a framework for studying such effects. Spatial autocorrelation, a geostatistical method, is used to analyze the spatial variation in the hydrological and water quality factors and to further analyze the effects of various factors on the spatial heterogeneity of e-flows. Four different methods including the Tennant method, wetted perimeter method, AEHRA, and integrated water quality method are integrated to comprehensively evaluate e-flows. The former three methods consider the demands of biota on the streamflow, whereas the latter considers the demands on both the streamflow and the water quality. The results show that the Tennant and wetted perimeter methods, which focus on the statistics of only streamflow, result in similar spatial distribution of e-flows; the AEHRA and integrated water quality method, which consider the effects of water quality and other hydrological factors such as flow velocity and water depth on fish, also result in a similar spatial variation. Consideration of both demands on the hydrological factors and the water quality environmental factors makes the integrated water quality method more practical, particularly in developing regions with excessive pollutant discharge into rivers. In addition, spatial variation in the hydrological and water quality factors influenced the presence of principal fish species and consequently affected the e-flows. Of the 37 water quality factors identified, water transparency had a negative impact on e-flow because the increase in transparency could reduce the number of principal fish species. Of the four hydrological factors, flow velocity and river width had positive impacts on fish because the increase in flow velocity can provide breeding sites and habitats for more fish, respectively, both of which result in increases in the numbers of principal fish species. We found that spatial variation in the hydrology and water quality factors had a profound impact on the living environments of aquatic organisms; negative changes in these factors lowered the survival probability of principal species, which changed the hierarchy and structure of the ecosystems and thus led to variation in e-flows. The results can provide priori knowledge for e-flow methods selection and a reference for ecosystem restoration helping improve the success rate of project elsewhere in the world.

Daily flow intermittence in an effluent‐dependent river: Impacts of flow duration and recession rate on fish stranding

Fishes move to transient local refuges, not persistent landscape refuges during river drying experiment

Why do fish strand? An analysis of ten years of flow reduction monitoring data from the Columbia and Kootenay rivers, Canada

Reduced Streamflow From Water Diversion Alters Stream Ecology and Fish Behavior

Navigating the drought: upstream migration of a small-sized Cypriniformes (Telestes muticellus) in response to drying in a partially intermittent mountain stream

The life cycle of intermittent streams: How do fish communities respond to annual cycles of wetting and drying?

Multi-scale drivers of daily flow intermittency in a regulated desert river

Prolonged low flows and non-native fish operate additively to alter insect emergence in mountain streams

Effects of episodic stream dewatering on brook trout spatial population structure

Long‐term environmental flows restore benthic invertebrate communities in a highly regulated river

Macroinvertebrate Community Responses to Disturbance in a Fragmented River With Contrasting Legacies of Alteration

Flow regimes in coastal California steelhead trout streams: Spatiotemporal patterns in magnitude, duration and timing

Stream flow and community stability

Impact of treated effluent discharges on fish communities: Evaluating the effects of pollution on fish distribution, abundance and environmental integrity

Extreme low‐flow effects on riverine fauna: A perspective on methodological assessments

Effects of spatial variation in water quality and hydrological factors on environmental flows

A permeable hyporheic zone may contribute to buffer the effects of a drying event on prey availability for salmonid juveniles

River regulation effects on zooplankton community assembly: Implications for arid river restoration and conservation

Exploring functional flow heterogeneity in regulated flow regime: Fish species turnover along hydraulic gradients in an artificial waterway network

The Effects of Wastewater Reuse on Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus dolomieu) Relative Abundance in the Shenandoah River Watershed, USA

Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment