Abstract:Environmental flow is the quantity, timing, and quality of water flows required to sustain freshwater and estuarine ecosystems and the human livelihoods and well-being that depend on these ecosystems. Environmental flows (e-flows) are crucial parameters for ecosystem restoration. Understanding the effects of spatial variation in the hydrological and water quality factors on e-flows aids the determination of recovery prior areas and helps to improve the success rate of ecosystem restoration projects. However, few studies have investigated the effects, which severely hinder the restoration of aquatic ecosystems and the sustainable use of water resources in inland waters. This paper therefore presents a framework for studying such effects. Spatial autocorrelation, a geostatistical method, is used to analyze the spatial variation in the hydrological and water quality factors and to further analyze the effects of various factors on the spatial heterogeneity of e-flows. Four different methods including the Tennant method, wetted perimeter method, AEHRA, and integrated water quality method are integrated to comprehensively evaluate e-flows. The former three methods consider the demands of biota on the streamflow, whereas the latter considers the demands on both the streamflow and the water quality. The results show that the Tennant and wetted perimeter methods, which focus on the statistics of only streamflow, result in similar spatial distribution of e-flows; the AEHRA and integrated water quality method, which consider the effects of water quality and other hydrological factors such as flow velocity and water depth on fish, also result in a similar spatial variation. Consideration of both demands on the hydrological factors and the water quality environmental factors makes the integrated water quality method more practical, particularly in developing regions with excessive pollutant discharge into rivers. In addition, spatial variation in the hydrological and water quality factors influenced the presence of principal fish species and consequently affected the e-flows. Of the 37 water quality factors identified, water transparency had a negative impact on e-flow because the increase in transparency could reduce the number of principal fish species. Of the four hydrological factors, flow velocity and river width had positive impacts on fish because the increase in flow velocity can provide breeding sites and habitats for more fish, respectively, both of which result in increases in the numbers of principal fish species. We found that spatial variation in the hydrology and water quality factors had a profound impact on the living environments of aquatic organisms; negative changes in these factors lowered the survival probability of principal species, which changed the hierarchy and structure of the ecosystems and thus led to variation in e-flows. The results can provide priori knowledge for e-flow methods selection and a reference for ecosystem restoration helping improve the success rate of project elsewhere in the world.

Flow regimes in coastal California steelhead trout streams: Spatiotemporal patterns in magnitude, duration and timing

Evaluation of a large-scale flow manipulation to the upper San Francisco Estuary: Response of habitat conditions for an endangered native fish

Hydraulic Microhabitats at a Regulated River Confluence Influence Chinook Salmon Migratory Routing During Drought

Integrated analysis of flow, form, and function for river management and design testing

Simulating Spawning and Juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Habitat in Colorado River Based on High-Flow Effects

Go with the flow: Impacts of high and low flow conditions on freshwater mussel assemblages and distribution

Prolonged low flows and non-native fish operate additively to alter insect emergence in mountain streams

Daily flow intermittence in an effluent‐dependent river: Impacts of flow duration and recession rate on fish stranding

Simplified Environmental Flow Metrics and Environmental Water Requirements for Mediterranean Seasonal Rivers

Environmental Influences on Fish Migration in a Hydropeaking River

Exploring functional flow heterogeneity in regulated flow regime: Fish species turnover along hydraulic gradients in an artificial waterway network

Stream Temperature Spatial Variability Reflects Geomorphology, Hydrology, and Microclimate: Navarro River Watershed, California

Groundwater is key to salmonid persistence and recruitment in intermittent Mediterranean‐climate streams

Effects of spatial variation in water quality and hydrological factors on environmental flows

Why do fish strand? An analysis of ten years of flow reduction monitoring data from the Columbia and Kootenay rivers, Canada

A Quantitative Assessment on the Response of Flow Regimes to Cumulative Forest Disturbances in Large Snow‐dominated Watersheds in the Interior of British Columbia, Canada

Longitudinal thermal heterogeneity in rivers and refugia for coldwater species: effects of scale and climate change

Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Low Streamflow and Precipitation Changes in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Fishes move to transient local refuges, not persistent landscape refuges during river drying experiment

Frequency of occurrence of flow regime components: a hydrology-based approach for environmental flow assessments and water allocation for the environment

Multi-scale drivers of daily flow intermittency in a regulated desert river