Abstract:Introduction: Previous lab experiments supported the needs-based model of reconciliation, which posits that discussing historical transgressions enhances the need for acceptance in groups perceived as perpetrators and empowerment in groups perceived as victims. Addressing these needs (e.g., through accepting or empowering messages from outgroup members) increases willingness to reconcile. This study tests this model in a real-world settings. Methods: Study 1 examined 143 German and Israeli Jewish participants from youth exchange programs, measuring their feelings of acceptance/empowerment, program satisfaction, outgroup attitudes, and keeping in touch with outgroup members. Study 2 examined 293 Israeli Jews, manipulating the salience of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians in a pre-registered laboratory experiment and measuring responses to accepting versus empowering messages from Germans. Results: As expected, Study 1 ( N =143) found Germans' feelings of acceptance were linked to program satisfaction, positive outgroup attitudes, and keeping in touch. For Israeli Jews, feelings of empowerment were linked to satisfaction and positive attitudes, but keeping in touch was unexpectedly linked to acceptance. This unexpected effect maybe because keeping in touch is done mainly through social networks that focus on the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, often with a focus on Israel's transgressions against Palestinians. Consistent with this explanation, Study 2 ( N =293, pre-registered) showed that Israeli Jews viewed accepting messages from Germans as more conciliatory when presented with transgressions against Palestinians, and empowering messages as more effective when presented with reminders of historical victimization by Nazis. Discussion: The findings from Study 1 partially support the needs-based model of reconciliation and additionally suggest that reconciliation needs vary with context. Implications for people-to-people peace-building interventions are discussed.

Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict: A commentary.

Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda.

What's in a norm? Sources and processes of norm change.

Teaching tolerance or acting tolerant? Evaluating skills- and contact-based prejudice reduction interventions among Palestinian-Israeli and Jewish-Israeli youth

Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria

Reducing Polarization on Abortion, Guns and Immigration: An Experimental Study

A Test of Interactive Narrative as a Tool Against Prejudice

Does outgroup media exposure reduce prejudice in real life? Testing mediated contact effects with media diets in South Africa

Reflective structured dialogue as a tool for addressing wicked public health problems

The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study

How contact can promote societal change amid conflict: An intergroup contact field experiment in Nigeria

Valuing diversity: An undervalued mediator of intergroup contact

Bridging the gap on Facebook: assessing intergroup contact and its effects for intergroup relations

Looking at their side of the conflict? Effects of single versus multiple perspective history teaching on Jewish and Arab adolescents’ attitude to out-group narratives and in-group responsibility

Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship

Reflections on prejudice and intergroup relations

Indirect contact and prejudice reduction: limits and possibilities

Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Listening to understand: The role of high-quality listening on speakers' attitude depolarization during disagreements

From the lab to the field and back: the effects of need satisfaction on reconciliation among Germans and Israelis