Abstract:PURPOSE A group of 3 WOC nurses and a nurse researcher, in partnership with the author of the Bates Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT), sought to validate wound photographs depicting each characteristic of the instrument. INSTRUMENT The BWAT contains 13 items that assess wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue type, amount of necrotic, granulation and epithelialization tissue, exudate type and amount, surrounding skin color, edema, and induration. These are rated using a modified Likert scale; a score of 1 indicates the healthiest and 5 indicates the most unhealthy attribute for each characteristic. In 2001, the PSST was revised and renamed the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool to reflect the global use of the tool with wound types beyond pressure ulcers. METHODS Phase 1 involved the selection of digitalized wound photographs for 11 of the BWAT wound characteristics by the researchers. The photographs needed to be of high resolution and good quality for eventual publication and validated by the original BWAT author as being representative of the intended characteristic. In phase 2, a face-to-face validation exercise was completed to include, edit, or exclude these photographs. Corrections were made; additional photographs were obtained for the remaining characteristics and to replace those not validated. Phase 3 involved an electronic survey that achieved validation online. PARTICIPANTS Phase 2 participants consisted of 15 WOC nurses with a mean of 11.5 years of experience with wounds. Phase 3 had 8 WOC nurses and 1 master's prepared wound care specialist, with approximately 10 years of experience. One third of participants in each phase were familiar with the BWAT. In a separate exercise to rate photographs that would be used for testing the implementation of the pictorial guide, 7 WOC nurses and 2 RNs who used the BWAT regularly and 2 researchers participated in a face-to-face discussion. RESULTS A total of 214 photographs were reviewed in this study. Seventy-three percent (n = 55) of the photographs for the pictorial guide were endorsed in phase 2, and 100% (n = 53) in phase 3 to demonstrate the 65 BWAT characteristics. In addition, photographs that could be used for a competency exercise and for pre- and posttests were also rated by the panels. CONCLUSIONS The photographic content of the BWAT pictorial guide has been validated by a small group of wound care experts. The purpose of the exercise was to create a visual learning aid to enhance the education around wound assessment and as a resource for nurses in practice. Now published in a pocket guide format, it is a standardized way to teach BWAT wound assessment skills in a consistent format.

The malignant wound assessment tool: a validation study using a Delphi approach

Malignant wound aetiology, diagnosis and management: a case series and literature review

Development of the Diabetic Wound Assessment Learning Tool (DiWALT) and validity evidence

Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Wounds Treated at a Wound Care Clinic

An Open-Label, Interventional, Prospective, Real-World Evidence Study to Evaluate a Multimodal Wound Matrix in Patients with Refractory Wounds

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Central Venous Access Device‐Associated Skin Impairment Classification Tool Using Modified Delphi and Clinimetric Methods

International mixed methods study protocol to develop a patient-reported outcome measure for all types of chronic wounds (the WOUND-Q)

A Clinical Support App for routine wound management: reducing practice variation, improving clinician confidence and increasing formulary compliance

Bates‐Jensen Wound Assessment Tool: Pictorial Guide Validation Project

Accuracy of digital measurement for quantitative and qualitative indicators of wound healing and repair: a systematic review protocol

The use of a multimodal wound matrix to treat a variety of hard-to-heal wounds: a case series surveillance

Developing and Testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a Self-assessment Tool to Improve Cancer Multidisciplinary Teamwork

Using a modified Delphi methodology to gain consensus on the use of dressings in chronic wounds management

Development of symptom-focused outcome measures for advanced and indolent systemic mastocytosis: the AdvSM-SAF and ISM-SAF©

A Step towards Enhanced Wound-Healing Assessment

Prognostic Impact of Malignant Wounds in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

Linguistic validation of the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule into French, German and US English

Confirmatory validation of the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients: A brief patient-reported outcome measure assessing psychological distress in malignant mesothelioma patients

Modification of existing patient-reported outcome measures: qualitative development of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MDASI-MPM)

Effectiveness of interventions to enhance shared decision‐making in wound care: A systematic review

Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0