A Step towards Enhanced Wound-Healing Assessment

Paul Julius Georg,Meret Emily Schmid,Sofia Zahia,Sebastian Probst,Simone Cazzaniga,Robert Hunger,Simon Bossart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123599
IF: 3.9
2024-06-20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: Chronic leg ulcers present a global challenge in healthcare, necessitating precise wound measurement for effective treatment evaluation. This study is the first to validate the "split-wound design" approach for wound studies using objective measures. We further improved this relatively new approach and combined it with a semi-automated wound measurement algorithm. Method: The algorithm is capable of plotting an objective halving line that is calculated by splitting the bounding box of the wound surface along the longest side. To evaluate this algorithm, we compared the accuracy of the subjective wound halving of manual operators of different backgrounds with the algorithm-generated halving line and the ground truth, in two separate rounds. Results: The median absolute deviation (MAD) from the ground truth of the manual wound halving was 2% and 3% in the first and second round, respectively. On the other hand, the algorithm-generated halving line showed a significantly lower deviation from the ground truth (MAD = 0.3%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The data suggest that this wound-halving algorithm is suitable and reliable for conducting wound studies. This innovative combination of a semi-automated algorithm paired with a unique study design offers several advantages, including reduced patient recruitment needs, accelerated study planning, and cost savings, thereby expediting evidence generation in the field of wound care. Our findings highlight a promising path forward for improving wound research and clinical practice.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of accurate measurement in the evaluation of chronic leg ulcer treatment. Specifically, the researchers developed and validated a semi - automatic wound segmentation algorithm for split - wound design studies. This new method aims to improve the accuracy of wound healing assessment, reduce the need for patient recruitment, accelerate research plans, and save costs, thereby promoting evidence generation in the field of wound care. ### Background Chronic leg ulcers are a global challenge in healthcare and require accurate wound measurement to effectively evaluate treatment effects. Traditional methods often require a large number of patient samples to obtain sufficient statistical power, which increases the difficulty of patient recruitment, prolongs the time of research plans, and increases costs. ### Research Objectives The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the performance and reliability of a semi - automatic wound segmentation algorithm, compare it with manual segmentation, and verify its applicability in split - wound design studies. The researchers hope that through this innovative method, they can more effectively evaluate the effect of wound treatment, reduce the need for patient recruitment, accelerate the research progress, and reduce the research cost. ### Methods 1. **Algorithm Design**: - The algorithm constructs a minimized bounding box by identifying the longest side of the wound, and then draws an objective dividing line within this bounding box to divide the wound into two equal areas. - Use an open - source image annotator to define the wound boundary. The algorithm calculates the total area of the entire rectangle, the wound area, and the non - wound area, and then finds the dividing line closest to 50% of the wound area by iteratively creating small rectangles. 2. **Experimental Setup**: - Twenty chronic leg ulcer images from different sources were selected, with a size of approximately 5 - 15 square centimeters. - Six evaluators participated in the study, including three wound experts (two dermatologists and one nurse) and three non - professionals (two students and one statistician). - The evaluators used the VGG image annotator to mark the wound boundary and draw the dividing line. The study was carried out in two rounds, with an interval of four weeks between each round. 3. **Statistical Analysis**: - Use the median and interquartile range (IQR) to represent the data. - Evaluate the intra - group and inter - group consistency through the intra - class correlation coefficient (ICC). - Use the Wilcoxon signed - rank test to compare the results of manual and automatic evaluations. ### Results - The median of the absolute deviation of manual segmentation was 2% (IQR = 1 - 4) in the first round and 3% (IQR = 1 - 5) in the second round. - The median of the absolute deviation of the dividing line generated by the algorithm was only 0.3% (IQR = 0.2 - 0.5), which was significantly lower than the result of manual segmentation (p < 0.001). - The evaluation of intra - group and inter - group consistency showed that the consistency of manual segmentation was poor (ICC = 0.01), while the consistency of the algorithm was good (ICC = 0.2). ### Discussion - The research results show that the semi - automatic wound segmentation algorithm is significantly superior to manual segmentation in terms of accuracy. - This method can reduce the need for patient recruitment, accelerate research plans, and reduce research costs, thereby promoting the research progress in the field of wound care. - Although there are some limitations, such as differences in venous and lymphatic drainage may introduce confounding factors, these effects can be reduced by randomly assigning the wound intervention side and using wound dividers. ### Conclusion - The combination of the semi - automatic wound segmentation algorithm and the split - wound design method provides a reliable tool for wound research and clinical practice. - This method not only improves the accuracy of wound assessment, but also provides new ways to evaluate wound healing dynamics, monitor treatment effects, and reduce research bias. - Future research should further improve the automated method of wound boundary segmentation and consider 3D analysis to more comprehensively evaluate wound healing.