Abstract:Statement of problem Different digital methods have been described for transferring the maxillary cast into a virtual articulator; however, its accuracy remains uncertain. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital methods. Material and methods A maxillary typodont with 5 markers was positioned into a mannequin, which was digitized by using an industrial scanner (ATOS Q) and an extraoral scan of the typodont obtained (T710). Three groups were created based on the technique used to transfer the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator (Panadent PCH Articulator): conventional facebow record (CNV group), digital photograph (P group), and facial scanning (FS group) (n=10). In the CNV group, conventional facebow records (Kois Dentofacial analyzer system) were digitized (T710) and used to mount the maxillary scan into the articulator by aligning it with the reference platform (Kois adjustable platform) (DentalCAD). In the P group, photographs with the reference glasses (Kois Reference Glasses 3.0) were positioned in the mannequin. Each photograph was superimposed with the maxillary scan. Then, the maxillary scan was transferred into the virtual articulator by using the true horizontal plane information of the photograph. In the FS group, facial scans with an extraoral scan body (Kois Scan Body) were positioned in the mannequin by using a facial scanner (Instarisa). The extraoral scan body was digitized by using the same extraoral scanner. The digitized extraoral scan body provided the true horizontal plane information that was used to mount the maxillary scan into the articulator, along with the Kois disposable tray of the scan body. On the reference scan and each specimen, 15 linear measurements between the markers of the maxillary scans and the horizontal plane of the virtual articulator and 3 linear measurements between the maxillary dental midline and articulator midline were calculated. The measurements of the reference scan were used as a control to assess trueness and precision. Trueness was analyzed by using 1-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α=.05). Precision was evaluated by using the Levene and pairwise comparisons Wilcoxon Rank sum tests. Results No significant trueness ( P =.996) or precision ( P =.430) midline discrepancies were found. Significant posterior right ( P <.001), anterior ( P =.005), posterior left ( P <.001), and overall ( P <.001) trueness discrepancies were revealed among the groups. The P group obtained the best posterior right, posterior left, and overall trueness and precision. The P and FS groups demonstrated the best anterior trueness, but no anterior precision discrepancies were found. Conclusions The techniques tested affected the accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator. In the majority of the parameters assessed, the photography method tested showed the best trueness and precision values. However, the maxillary cast transfer accuracy ranged from 137 ±44 μm to 453 ±176 μm among the techniques tested.

Digital Mounting Jigs: A Novel Technique

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Cast-free modified digital twin-stage technique for complete mouth rehabilitation: A dental technique

Digital Technologies for Restorative Dentistry

Design of Occlusal Wear Facets of Fixed Dental Prostheses Driven by Personalized Mandibular Movement.

Modeling of digital dental articulator and its accuracy verification using optical measurement

Application of 3D digital smile design based on virtual articulation analysis in esthetic dentistry: A technique

Accuracy of virtual articulation in maximal intercuspal position in direct and indirect digital workflows for fixed partial denture fabrication

Enhancing Fixed Partial Denture Pontic Fabrication: An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Digital and Manual Techniques

Trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital methods for transferring the interocclusal relationship in complete mouth rehabilitation.

Three-point Sectional-Cast Digital Method for Transferring the Interocclusal Relationship for Full-Mouth Rehabilitation of Worn Dentition.

Facially Driven Digital Workflow for Maxillary and Mandibular Milled Implant- Retained Overdentures Using Two Different Unsplinted Attachment Systems: Case Report

A Digital Workflow for Single Complete Denture Using a Multi-Functional Diagnostic Denture.

A digital workflow for designing and manufacturing metal frameworks and removable partial dentures: A novel dental technique

Effect of Abutment Tooth Geometry On The Accuracy of Fixed Prosthodontics Casts Obtained by Digital and Analog Workflows—In Vitro Study

Accuracy of the maxillary cast transfer into the virtual semi-adjustable articulator by using analog and digital facebow record methods

Digitally printed custom trays assembled with occlusion rims and gothic arch tracing devices attached with tenon-and-mortise joints for biofunctional complete dentures: A dental technique

An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator

A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study

Comparative Accuracy of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Workflows for Short Span Implant Supported Fixed Partial Denture Fabrication: An In Vitro Study

A digital workflow for fabricating a mandibular guide plane prosthesis for patients about to undergo hemimandibulectomy: A dental technique