Abstract:BackgroundAccording to current evidence, adding decompressive craniectomy (DC) to best medical therapy reduces case fatality rate of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by 50–75%. There is currently little information available regarding the outcome of subgroups, in particular of patients with extensive infarctions exceeding the territory of the middle cerebral artery.MethodsThe records of 101 patients with large hemispheric infarctions undergoing DC were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-seven patients had additional ACA and/or PCA infarcts. Sequential CTs were used for postoperative follow-up. Intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored via a ventricular catheter in comatose patients. The main aim of treatment was to keep midline shift below 10 mm and ICP below 20 mmHg. If midline shift increased despite preceding DC, repeat surgery with removal of clearly necrotic tissue was considered. For the current analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at 14 days and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months were used as outcome parameters. mRS 2 and 3 were defined as “moderate disability”, mRS 4 as “severe disability”, and mRS 5 and 6 as “poor outcome”. These outcome parameters were correlated to age, gender, side, vascular territory, and time delay after stroke, GCS at the time of decompression, maximum ICP, maximum midline shift, and delay of maximum shift.ResultsThe median age of the 39 female and 62 male patients was 56 years (range, 5–79 years). Overall, 12 patients died in the acute stage (11.9%). Twenty-three (22.8%) patients recovered to moderate disability at 3 months (mRS ≤ 3), 45 (44.6%) to severe disability and 33 (32.6%) suffered a poor outcome (mRS 5 or 6). Twenty patients (19.8%) required additional necrosectomy due to secondary increasing midline shift and/or intracranial hypertension. Patients recovering to moderate disability at 3 months were in the median 10 years younger than patients with less favorable outcome (P < 0.001) and had a higher GCS prior to surgery (P < 0.001). Eleven of the 27 patients with infarctions exceeding the MCA territory needed secondary surgery, indicating a higher necrosectomy rate as for isolated MCA infarction. At 3 months, the distribution of the outcomes in terms of mRS was comparable between the patients suffering from extended infarctions and patients having isolated MCA stroke. Infarctions exceeding the territory of the middle cerebral artery were seen in 30% of the group recovering to moderate disability and thus as frequent as in the groups suffering a less favorable outcome.ConclusionsIntensified postoperative management including possible secondary decompression with necrosectomy may further reduce case fatality rate of patients with large hemispheric infarction. Age above 60 years and severely reduced level of consciousness are the most significant factors heralding unfavorable recovery. Patients suffering infarctions exceeding the MCA territory have a comparable chance of favorable recovery as patients with isolated MCA infarction.

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in a 19-Month-Old Female after Malignant Cerebral Infarction

Is Decompressive Craniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction of Any Worth?

Effect of decompressive hemicraniectomy performed within the first 48 hours on mortality in the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery

Contralateral Subdural Effusion after Decompressive Craniectomy: What is the Optimal Treatment?

Contralateral haematoma secondary to decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma: a descriptive study of 15 cases.

Decompressive craniectomy in children: indications and outcome from a tertiary centre

Clinical analysis of decompressive craniectomy in children with posttraumatic massive cerebral infarction

Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction including patients with additional involvement of the anterior and/or posterior cerebral artery territory—outcome analysis and definition of prognostic factors

Is decompressive craniectomy for acute cerebral infarction of any benefit?

How I do it: decompressive hemicraniectomy supplemented with resection of the temporal pole and tentoriotomy for malignant ischemic infarction in the territory supplied by the middle cerebral artery

Malignant cerebral infarction (MCI): Review of the benefits of decompression craniectomy (DC)

Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Current Status and Future Directions

Post-COVID-19 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome-Related Cerebral Infarction in a Pediatric Patient Managed with Decompressive Craniectomy

Assessment of the results of treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction

A Cohort Study of Decompressive Craniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction

Malignant MCA Infarction: Pathophysiology and Imaging for Early Diagnosis and Management Decisions

Advances of Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy After Cerebral Fat Embolism

Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Patients with Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Surgery for Malignant Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review of the Knowns and Unknowns

Treatment of Huge Hypertensive Putaminal Hemorrhage by Surgery and Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage.