Malignant cerebral infarction (MCI): Review of the benefits of decompression craniectomy (DC)

Grazielle de Oliveira Marques,Gabriel Nogueira Noleto Vasconcelos,Gabriel Rodrigues Gomes da Fonseca,Renato Sarnaglia Proença,Pablo Henrique da Costa Silva,Leonardo Martins Parca,Ahmad Abdallah Hilal Nasser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/1516-3180.261
2021-01-01
Abstract:Background: MCI is caused by occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) or internal carotid artery. Causing large ischemias, which edema can exert a mass effect, usually between the 2nd and 5th day, resulting in intracranial hypertension, herniation and even death. Objective: Review data related to the benefits of DC, elucidating the procedure, prognosis and indications of the method. Method: Review on MEDLINE and PubMed platforms. The descriptors: “craniectomy” AND “malignant infarction”. Were selected 9 articles dated between 2016 and 2021. Results: MCI has some clinical (Youngs, NIHSS>15, neurological deterioration) and radiological predictors (Impairment> 50% of the ACM territory, midline deviation> 5mm, MRI with DWI> 145 cm3). These patient’s clinical aim is to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP), however, as a consequence of the worse prognosis in clinical therapy, there’s a possibility of intervention by DC, which is a surgical technique that relieves ICP and prevents secondary injuries. It reduces the mortality rate and increases the patient’s survival up 3x compared to clinical management, but at the expense of low quality of life. Patients ≤60 years with loss of consciousness, must have an indication for DC within 48 hours after ictus. The indication should be better evaluated and a thorough discussion with family members. Conclusion: DC minimizes injuries and the risk of herniation. However, despite decreasing mortality, it can lead to complications and poor prognosis, although it isn’t uncommon the indication for the procedure and an approach to palliative care.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?