One-lung Ventilation Using Proseal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and Arndt Endobronchial Blocker in Paediatric Scoliosis Surgery
P. Li,Wei-bin Liang,Hongbin Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep325
IF: 11.719
2009-01-01
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Abstract:Editor—Recently, the use of one-lung ventilation (OLV) is strongly indicated in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for exposure of surgical fields. We report a case of OLV using a size 3 Proseal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and a 7 Fr Arndt endobronchial blocker in a paediatric patient to achieve OLV. An 11-yr-old patient, who weighed 32 kg, was undergoing thoracoscopic anterior spinal release operation of thoracic vertebrae for idiopathic scoliosis. General anaesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol 4 µg ml−1, fentanyl 150 µg, and rocuronium 30 mg, a size 3 Proseal™ LMA (LMA North America, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was placed and the lungs were ventilated with pressure-controlled mode. A 7 Fr Arndt endobronchial blocker (Arndt Endobronchial Blocker Set by Cook Critical Care) was connected with the multiport adaptor and a 3.4 mm fibroscope. The fibroscope (modal BF, Type3 C40, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was inserted into the right bronchus, the blocker was passed coupled with the guide-loop. After a proper cuff position was confirmed by fibroscope, which was then withdrawn, leaving the endobronchial blocker between the vocal cords and enough space for ventilation (Fig. 1). After lateral positioning of the patient, a fibroscope examination revealed movement of the blocker cuff, adjustment was completed under vision. Before the insertion of the thoracoscopic port, the breathing circuit was disconnected and halted for 2 min to facilitate lung collapse, and the cuff was then inflated with 4 ml of air under direct vision. After that, the cuff was inflated again and OLV of the left-dependent lung was started. The inspiratory peak pressure was around 28–30 cm of water and the oxygen saturation level at 100% throughout OLV. The surgery went on smoothly, and the patient woke up quietly with the laryngeal mask. OLV is traditionally achieved in larger children with a double-lumen tube (DLT). The smallest DLT is a 26 Fr (Rusch, Duluth, GA, USA), which may be used in children from about 8 yr old. However, there is significant variability in overall size and airway dimensions in children, particularly in teenagers.1Hammer GB Pediatric thoracic anesthesia.Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 1449-1464Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar The Arndt endobronchial blocker has been recently reported as an elegant solution, but usually used together with a conventional tracheal tube.2Arndt GA Kranner PW Rusy DA et al.Single-lung ventilation in a critically ill patient using a fiberoptically directed wire-guided endobronchial blocker.Anesthesiology. 1995; 90: 1484-1486Crossref Scopus (71) Google Scholar 3Wald SH Mahajan A Kaplan MB Atkinson JB Experience with the Arndt paediatric bronchial blocker.Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94: 92-94Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar In very small patients, the use of even the smallest blocker, the 5 Fr, is clearly limited by its external diameter and it can be placed only via a tracheal tube of internal diameter 4.5 mm or larger and requires an ultrathin (2.2 mm) bronchoscope.4Bird GT Hall M Nel L Davies E Ross O Effectiveness of Arndt endobronchial blockers in pediatric scliosis surgery: a case series.Paediatr Anaesth. 2007; 17: 289-294Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar External use of Arndt endobronchial tube was reported in an infant.5Bastien JL Brien JG Frantz FW Extraluminal use of the Arndt pediatric endobronchial blocker in an infant: a case report.Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53: 159-161Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar There are no reports of its use in paediatric patients in combination with Proseal™ LMA. Without an ultrathin bronchoscope, we decided to place the endobronchial blocker via the Proseal™ LMA. The problem we had was how to ventilate the lungs at a relatively high pressure with the LMA during the OLV period. The Proseal™ LMA has been shown to form a more effective seal and was proven to apply PEEP during pressure-controlled ventilation which leads to an improved arterial oxygenation in paediatric patients.6Goldmann K Roettger C Wulf H Use of the Proseal™ laryngeal mask airway for pressure-controlled ventilaton with and without positive end-expiratory pressure in paediatric patients: a randomized, controlled study.Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95: 831-834Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar In our case, the effective seal of the Proseal™ LMA allowed adequate ventilation during OLV and the use of PEEP allowed complete reexpansion of the collapsed non-dependent lung after the surgery. The use of an Arndt endobronchial blocker may overcome some of the limitations of DLT, such as difficult airway or paediatric patients. When applied in combination with Proseal™ LMA, the limitations of traditional use of endobronchial blockers can be further overcome. This novel combination can be very useful in many clinical scenarios, such as very small children, and make thoracic anesthesia much easier.