Abstract:Conditional thank-you gifts are one of the most widely used incentives for charitable giving. Past studies explored non-monetary thank-you gifts (e.g., mugs and shirts) and monetary thank-you gifts (e.g., rebates that return some of the donations to the giver). Following the rapid growth of blockchain technology, a novel form of thank-you gifts emerged: the crypto rewards. Through two studies, we analyze crypto thank-you gifts to shed light on fundraising designs in the digital world. In Study I, we examine the Ukrainian government's crypto fundraising plea that accepts donations in both Ethereum and Bitcoin. We find that Ethereum is substantially more effective in enticing giving than Bitcoin, as the hourly donation count increased 706.07% more for Ethereum than for Bitcoin when crypto rewards are present. This is likely because the crypto rewards are more likely to be issued on Ethereum than Bitcoin. However, the decrease in contribution sizes is also more substantial in Ethereum than in Bitcoin in response to the crypto rewards. In Study II, we conducted a laboratory experiment following a dictator game design to investigate the impact of crypto rewards in a more general scenario, with the crypto rewards specified as non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The crypto rewards in Study II carry no monetary value but only serve to recognize donors symbolically. As such, the NFT thank-you gifts did not effectively induce people to donate; a traditional 1:1 donation matching strictly outperforms both the condition without thank-you gifts and the condition with NFT thank-you gifts. Nevertheless, the NFT thank-you gifts effectively increased the contribution sizes, conditional on the choice to give, when the NFT's graphic design primes donor identity and encompasses the charity recipient.

Strategic donation as a signal of cooperation intention: a laboratory experiment

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Unobserved Altruism: How Self-Signaling Motivations and Social Benefits Shape Willingness to Donate

A Double-edged Sword : Using Public Recognition to Encourage Individual Charitable Giving . – Evidence from a Field Experiment in China

Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games

The Impact of Information Disclosure and the Incentive Mechanism on Individual Intertemporal Committed Donation:An Experiment Study

Multiple Information Signals in the Market for Charitable Donations

Using social norms to explain giving behavior

The Other Side of the Coin: Recipient Norms and Their Impact on Indirect Reciprocity and Cooperation

Anonymity, nonverbal communication and prosociality in digitized interactions: An experiment on charitable giving

How the Frequency and Amount of Corporate Donations Affect Consumer Perception and Behavioral Responses

Synchrony Influences Estimates of Cooperation in a Public-Goods Game

Minimal social cues in the dictator game

How Altruistic is Indirect Reciprocity? - Evidence from Gift-Exchange Games in the Lab

How the Perceived Cost of Prosocial Action Inspires Observers to Contribute

Hyper-altruistic behavior vanishes with high stakes

Cooperation in public goods experiments with random and finite stopping rules

A comparative fMRI meta-analysis of altruistic and strategic decisions to give

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

Paying It Forward: an Experimental Study on Social Connections and Indirect Reciprocity

The Effect of Crypto Rewards in Fundraising: From a Quasi-Experiment to a Dictator Game