Synchrony Influences Estimates of Cooperation in a Public-Goods Game

Luke McEllin,Natalie Sebanz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231223410
IF: 10.172
2024-01-30
Psychological Science
Abstract:Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. Benefiting from a cooperative interaction requires people to estimate how cooperatively other members of a group will act so that they can calibrate their own behavior accordingly. We investigated whether the synchrony of a group's actions influences observers' estimates of cooperation. Participants (recruited through Prolific) watched animations of actors deciding how much to donate in a public-goods game and using a mouse to drag donations to a public pot. Participants then estimated how much was in the pot in total (as an index of how cooperative they thought the group members were). Experiment 1 (N = 136 adults) manipulated the synchrony between players' decision-making time, and Experiment 2 (N = 136 adults) manipulated the synchrony between players' decision-implementing movements. For both experiments, estimates of how much was in the pot were higher for synchronous than asynchronous groups, demonstrating that the temporal dynamics of an interaction contain signals of a group's level of cooperativity.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?