Abstract:At the time of the election of the European Parliament (EP) in 2014, the European Union (EU) was heavily affected by a multifaceted crisis that had – and still has – far‐reaching implications for the political system of its member countries, but also for the European level of governance. Against the background of the strong Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 EP elections, this study aims to investigate in which way Eurosceptic parties of the left and the right respond to the multiple crises of the EU. Using data from the Euromanifesto Project from 2004/2009 and 2014, changes in the party positions towards the EU are analysed in the shadow of the multiple crises and the reasons thereof are explored. The findings show a general anti‐European shift among the two types of Eurosceptic parties. Nevertheless, the changes in the EU polity tone are not determined by issue‐based repercussions of the multiple crises, but by the EU‐related evaluation – the polity mood – of the national citizenry. For far‐right Eurosceptic parties, the shift is moderated by the level of public support for EU integration in their national environment. Among far‐left Eurosceptic parties, by contrast, it is moderated by the more specific public attitudes about the monetary union policy of the EU. Consequently, political parties when drafting their manifestos for EP elections are not so much guided by the objective severity of political problems or by the evaluations of these problems by the citizenry. What matters in the end is the link that citizens themselves are able to establish between the severity of political problems, on the one hand, and the responsibility of the EU for these problems on the other. This has important consequences for understanding of the nature and substance of political responsiveness within the EU system of multilevel governance.

Crisis pressures and European integration

European integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the euro and Schengen crises

Crisis and polity formation in the European Union

From the euro to the Schengen crises: European integration theories, politicization, and identity politics

Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration

European Integration Theory

EU health policy in the aftermath of COVID-19: neofunctionalism and crisis-driven integration

Grand theories of European integration in the twenty-first century

Grand theories of European integration revisited: does identity politics shape the course of European integration?

Regulation Theory and the Political Economy of the European Union

A New Integration Era in the EU: Theory, Assessment and Main Challenges

THEORIZING THE EUROPEAN UNION: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?

Reconfiguring sovereignty: crisis, politicization, and European integration

The strength of a weak centre: pandemic politics in the European Union and the United States

Schramm, Lucas. 2024. Crises of European Integration: Joining Together or Falling Apart? Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. XVII, 303 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54748-5.

Explaining the Emergence of Different European Union Crisis and Emergency Management Structures

Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration

Responding to the crisis: Eurosceptic parties of the left and right and their changing position towards the European Union

Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration

Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation

European Solidarity Takes the Field: The Dimensional Structure of Political Competition in the European Union After the Polycrisis