Abstract:This paper empirically describes a gradual development of European Union's (EU’s) Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), in order to examine the explanatory power of Liberal Intergovernmentalism (LI). LI provides us with a tool to understand EU's institutional choices, in other words, integration, by focusing on (1) national preference formation, (2) interstate bargaining, and (3) institutional choice. After the EU and its member states tackled the financial and fiscal crisis and launched a plan to complete a genuine EMU, some scholars of LI highlighted that the policy preference of Germany, as the creditor of the EU, influenced the outcome of negotiations / institutional choices. However, all the decisions taken by EU and its member states are not concluded by German's interests. For example, European Central Bank's decision of an Outright Monetary Transactions contributed to calm down the crisis, though Germany opposed to the decision. Also, LI must show why a certain institutional solution was accepted by other member states and such a solution was understood as "lowering transaction costs". But LI's theoretical scope is static and short-time: LI explains a current institutional choice by the current national preference formation and interstate bargain at that time. It would be difficult to exhibit that member states learned from previous events and came to understand that a newly launched solution would contribute to lower the transaction costs of themselves. Therefore, this paper casts doubts on LI's arguments and analysis on the institutional choice after crisis, and exhibits the historical development of European Economic and Monetary Union. The history of Economic and Monetary Union tells us that every institutional choice of European monetary / currency issue was not made of a single member state's preference. In the cases of the Werner Report (the itinial plan for the economic and monetary union), the Snake, the European Monetary System, and the launch of Euro, member states' preferences were accepted / adopted partially and institutional designs in these cases were partial solutions to the questions at that times: integration was partially achieved and therefore integration was developed gradually. And what should be noted is that international financial market, especially speculation, might be both triggers of the crisis and judges to the European solutions to the crisis. These empirical findings imply that we have to consider other factors, for example, international political and economic environment, other than national governments and EU institutions, in order to analyze and explain the gradual development, in other words, stop and go, of European integration.

From one crisis to another: changes in the governance of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)

The politics of IMF–EU co-operation: institutional change from the Maastricht Treaty to the launch of the euro

Explaining the response of the ECB to the COVID-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning

European integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the euro and Schengen crises

The European Parliament in the Economic and Monetary Union after COVID: towards a slow empowerment?

Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration

From the Maastricht Treaty to Post-crisis EMU: The ECB and Germany as Drivers of Change

Getting Closer or Falling Apart? Euro Countries After the Euro Crisis

Economic and Monetary Union at twenty: a stocktaking of a tumultuous second decade: introduction

Beyond the North–South divide: transnational coalitions in EU reforms

National states, transnational institutions, and hegemony in the EU

Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation

Change to Stay the Same? German European Preference Formation During the COVID-19 Crisis

No More Credit to Europe? Cross-Border Bank Lending, Financial Integration, and the Rebirth of the National Scale as a Credit Scorecard

Socializing the European Semester: EU social and economic policy co-ordination in crisis and beyond

Crisis and polity formation in the European Union

Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration

Consumer and business confidence connectedness in the euro area: a tale of two crises

A study of explanatory power of Liberal Intergovernmentalism toward the Economic and Monetary Union

Governance mechanisms, accounting regulation, and corporate disclosure in the aftermath of Covid‐19: Novel research questions and methodological opportunities

The EU’s problem-solving capacity and legitimacy in a crisis context: a virtuous or vicious circle?