Author Response for "wherefore Art Thou Competitors? How Situational Affordances Help Differentiate among Prosociality, Individualism, and Competition"
Yi Liu,Adam W. Stivers,Ryan O. Murphy,Niels J. Van Doesum,Jeff Joireman,Marcello Gallucci,Efrat Aharonov-Majar,Ursula Athenstaedt,Liying Bai,Robert Böhm,Nancy R. Buchan,Xiao-Ping Chen,Kitty B. Dumont,Jan B. Engelmann,Kimmo Eriksson,Hyun Euh,Susann Fiedler,Justin Friesen,Simon Gächter,Camilo Garcia,Roberto González,Sylvie Graf,Katarzyna Growiec,Martina Hřebíčková,Gokhan Karagonlar,Toko Kiyonari,Yu Kou,D. Michael Kuhlman,Siugmin Lay,Geoffrey J. Leonardelli,Norman P. Li,Yang Li,Boris Maciejovsky,Zoi Manesi,Ali Mashuri,Aurelia Mok,Karin S. Moser,Adrian Netedu,Chandrasekhar Pammi,Michael J. Platow,Christopher P. Reinders Folmer,Cecilia Reyna,Cláudia Simão,Sonja Utz,Leander van der Meij,Sven Waldzus,Yiwen Wang,Bernd Weber,Ori Weisel,Tim Wildschut,Fabian Winter,Junhui Wu,Jose C. Yong,Paul A. M. Van Lange
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070241298850/v2/response1
2024-01-01
Abstract:The Triple Dominance Measure (choosing between prosocial, individualistic, and competitive options) and the Slider Measure (“sliding” between various orientations, for example, from individualistic to prosocial) are two widely used techniques to measure social value orientation, that is, the weight individuals assign to own and others’ outcomes in interdependent situations. Surprisingly, there is only moderate correspondence between these measures, but it is unclear why and what the implications are for identifying individual differences in social value orientation. Using a dataset of 8021 participants from 31 countries and regions, this study revealed that the Slider Measure identified fewer competitors than the Triple Dominance Measure, accounting for approximately one-third of the non-correspondence between the two measures. This is (partially) because many of the Slider items do not afford a competitive option. In items where competition is combined with individualism, competitors tended to make the same choices as individualists. Futhermore, we demonstrated the uniqueness of competitors. Compared to prosocials and individualists, competitors exhibited lower levels of both social mindfulness and trust. Overall, the present work highlights the importance of situational affordances in measuring personality, the benefits of distinguishing between individualists and competitors, and the importance of utilizing a measure that distinguishes between these two proself orientations.