Abstract:In many animal societies, individuals differ consistently in their ability to win agonistic interactions, resulting in dominance hierarchies. These differences arise due to a range of factors that can influence individuals' abilities to win agonistic interactions, spanning from genetically driven traits through to individuals' recent interaction history. Yet, despite a century of study since Schjelderup-Ebbe's seminal paper on social dominance, we still lack a general understanding of how these different factors work together to determine individuals' positions in hierarchies. Here, we first outline five widely studied factors that can influence interaction outcomes: intrinsic attributes, resource value asymmetry, winner-loser effects, dyadic interaction-outcome history and third-party support. A review of the evidence shows that a variety of factors are likely important to interaction outcomes, and thereby individuals' positions in dominance hierarchies, in diverse species. We propose that such factors are unlikely to determine dominance outcomes independently, but rather form part of feedback loops whereby the outcomes of previous agonistic interactions (e.g. access to food) impact factors that might be important in subsequent interactions (e.g. body condition). We provide a conceptual framework that illustrates the multitude potential routes through which such feedbacks can occur, and how the factors that determine the outcomes of dominance interactions are highly intertwined and thus rarely act independently of one another. Further, we generalise our framework to include multi-generational feed-forward mechanisms: how interaction outcomes in one generation can influence the factors determining interaction outcomes in the next generation via a range of parental effects. This general framework describes how interaction outcomes and the factors determining them are linked within generations via feedback loops, and between generations via feed-forward mechanisms. We then highlight methodological approaches that will facilitate the study of feedback loops and dominance dynamics. Lastly, we discuss how our framework could shape future research, including: how feedbacks generate variation in the factors discussed, and how this might be studied experimentally; how the relative importance of different feedback mechanisms varies across timescales; the role of social structure in modulating the effect of feedbacks on hierarchy structure and stability; and the routes of parental influence on the dominance status of offspring. Ultimately, by considering dominance interactions as part of a dynamic feedback system that also feeds forward into subsequent generations, we will understand better the factors that structure dominance hierarchies in animal groups.

An interactionist perspective on dominance‐submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill

The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance

Couple dominance, dark personality traits, and power motivation

An Integrative Interdisciplinary Perspective on Social Dominance Hierarchies.

Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward

Dominance as an Indicator of Rapport and Learning in Human-Agent Communication

How feedback and feed-forward mechanisms link determinants of social dominance

Dominance in humans

The nonmeek inherit the earth: Children generalize dominance, but not submissiveness.

Nonverbal Behaviors “Speak” Relational Messages of Dominance, Trust, and Composure

Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies

The role of dominance in sibling relationships: differences in interactive cooperative and competitive behavior

Behavioral traits that define social dominance are the same that reduce social influence in a consensus task

Involuntary subordination and its relation to personality, mood, and submissive behavior.

Fighting the good fight: Relating warmth and dominance across romantic conflict to resolution

Comparative Investigations of Social Context-Dependent Dominance in Captive Chimpanzees (pan Troglodytes) and Wild Tibetan Macaques (macaca Thibetana)

Authoritarianism, Dominance, and Social Behavior: A Perspective from Evolutionary Personality Psychology

Generative neural networks for experimental manipulation: Examining dominance-trustworthiness face impressions with data-efficient models

Social Influence and Nonverbal Exchange

Trait dominance promotes reflexive staring at masked angry body postures

Advances in understanding neural mechanisms of social dominance